Advanced Search
Clear
12 results
Filters
Sort By
Results Per Page
Filters
Advanced Search
Clear
12 results
Download the following citations:
Email the following citations:
Print the following citations:
  • Hernández D
  • Vázquez-Sánchez T
  • Sola E
  • Lopez V
  • Ruiz-Esteban P
  • et al.
BMC Nephrol. 2022 Nov 7;23(1):357 doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02989-z.
CET Conclusion
Reviewer: Mr John O'Callaghan, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford
Conclusion: This is a clearly written protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. The hypothesis is that treatment of early borderline lesions (within 3 months of transplant) will prevent or decrease progression of IFTA. The treatment used will be rabbit ATG, so a safety study will be as important as any improvement at a histological level. The study is based on the fact that early, subclinical lesions are an indicator of subsequent drop in graft function and reduced graft survival, and that treatment at this stage will have a positive impact. Length of follow up is 24 months, which should be long enough to assess efficacy and safety in general. Patients will require a 3-month protocol biopsy to then determine whether or not they enter randomisation. The sample size calculation has made reference to previous data and expected dropout rates.
Aims: This study aims to investigate the effects of treating early borderline lesions with polyclonal rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Grafalon®) in comparison to conventional therapy, in low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients.
Interventions: Participants will be randomly assigned to either the Grafalon® group or the standard treatment group.
Participants: The study will randomise 80 kidney transplant recipients with low immunological risk.
Outcomes: The primary outcomes are the presence of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) and graft function. The main efficacy outcomes are function and histological lesions.
Follow Up: N/A
BACKGROUND:

Subclinical inflammation, including borderline lesions (BL), is very common (30-40%) after kidney transplantation (KT), even in low immunological risk patients, and can lead to interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) and worsening of renal function with graft loss. Few controlled studies have analyzed the therapeutic benefit of treating these BL on renal function and graft histology. Furthermore, these studies have only used bolus steroids, which may be insufficient to slow the progression of these lesions. Klotho, a transmembrane protein produced mainly in the kidney with antifibrotic properties, plays a crucial role in the senescence-inflammation binomial of kidney tissue. Systemic and local inflammation decrease renal tissue expression and soluble levels of α-klotho. It is therefore important to determine whether treatment of BL prevents a decrease in α-klotho levels, progression of IFTA, and loss of kidney function.

METHODS:

The TRAINING study will randomize 80 patients with low immunological risk who will receive their first KT. The aim of the study is to determine whether the treatment of early BL (3rd month post-KT) with polyclonal rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Grafalon®) (6 mg/kg/day) prevents or decreases the progression of IFTA and the worsening of graft function compared to conventional therapy after two years post-KT, as well as to analyze whether treatment of BL with Grafalon® can modify the expression and levels of klotho, as well as the pro-inflammatory cytokines that regulate its expression.

DISCUSSION:

This phase IV investigator-driven, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial will examine the efficacy and safety of Grafalon® treatment in low-immunological-risk KT patients with early BL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

clinicaltrials.gov : NCT04936282. Registered June 23, 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04936282?term=NCT04936282&draw=2&rank=1 . Protocol Version 2 of 21 January 2022.

SPONSOR:

Canary Isles Institute for Health Research Foundation, Canary Isles (FIISC). mgomez@fciisc.org .

  • Hernández D
  • Alonso-Titos J
  • Vázquez T
  • León M
  • Caballero A
  • et al.
J Clin Med. 2021 May 7;10(9) doi: 10.3390/jcm10092005.
CET Conclusion
Reviewer: Mr Simon Knight, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford
Conclusion: This interesting multicentre study investigates the impact of late steroid withdrawal on graft histology following renal transplantation. Low risk patients 3 months post-transplant were randomized to withdrawal or continuation. Steroid withdrawal appeared safe for the majority of patients, with no increase in rejection or de-novo DSA and improved cardiovascular risk profile in keeping with previous studies. Of note, patients with subclinical inflammation at baseline (prior to withdrawal) demonstrated increased chronicity scores at 24 months if undergoing steroid withdrawal. This implies that baseline biopsy might be useful when considering steroid withdrawal, even in a low-risk cohort.
Aims: This study aimed to examine the impact of corticosteroid withdrawal (CSW) on inflammatory and chronic histological changes in kidney transplant recipients following transplantation.
Interventions: Participants were randomised to either the corticosteroid continuation group or the corticosteroid withdrawal group.
Participants: 105 low-immunological-risk kidney transplant recipients.
Outcomes: Acute rejection, inflammatory and chronicity scores, Banff scores, occurrence of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA), clinical and biochemical data during follow up, patient survival, graft survival and safety.
Follow Up: 24 months

The impact of corticosteroid withdrawal on medium-term graft histological changes in kidney transplant (KT) recipients under standard immunosuppression is uncertain. As part of an open-label, multicenter, prospective, phase IV, 24-month clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02284464) in low-immunological-risk KT recipients, 105 patients were randomized, after a protocol-biopsy at 3 months, to corticosteroid continuation (CSC, n = 52) or corticosteroid withdrawal (CSW, n = 53). Both groups received tacrolimus and MMF and had another protocol-biopsy at 24 months. The acute rejection rate, including subclinical inflammation (SCI), was comparable between groups (21.2 vs. 24.5%). No patients developed dnDSA. Inflammatory and chronicity scores increased from 3 to 24 months in patients with, at baseline, no inflammation (NI) or SCI, regardless of treatment. CSW patients with SCI at 3 months had a significantly increased chronicity score at 24 months. HbA1c levels were lower in CSW patients (6.4 ± 1.2 vs. 5.7 ± 0.6%; p = 0.013) at 24 months, as was systolic blood pressure (134.2 ± 14.9 vs. 125.7 ± 15.3 mmHg; p = 0.016). Allograft function was comparable between groups and no patients died or lost their graft. An increase in chronicity scores at 2-years post-transplantation was observed in low-immunological-risk KT recipients with initial NI or SCI, but CSW may accelerate chronicity changes, especially in patients with early SCI. This strategy did, however, improve the cardiovascular profiles of patients.

  • Hernández D
  • Vázquez T
  • Alonso-Titos J
  • León M
  • Caballero A
  • et al.
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 29;10(9) doi: 10.3390/jcm10091934.
CET Conclusion
Reviewer: Mr John O'Callaghan, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford
Conclusion: This paper reports on sub-clinical inflammation in low-risk renal transplantation. It was performed within a trial of corticosteroid withdrawal, and hence the randomisation is not related directly to this paper. Protocol biopsies were performed at 3 months after transplant, during which time no patient had acute rejection or developed de novo DSA. The biopsies showed that 54% of recipients had sub-clinical inflammation (which is in agreement with previous studies). This inflammation was correlated significantly with the absolute number of HLA mismatches, and independently with Class II mismatches in multivariate analysis, but not Class I. At this level of breakdown, however, there is a question of adequate power to make this assessment. In the multivariate analysis, several other factors were assessed and found not to be independent predictors of sub-clinical inflammation: recipient age, DGF, transfusion prior to transplant, and tacrolimus. Subclinical inflammation is present in half of kidney transplants on protocol biopsies and there is evidence from other studies that these changes can lead to chronic damage and dysfunction. The study is limited by its small sample size and ethnic homogeneity (100% Caucasian). It also represents an analysis of results from an RCT, and therefore may show association but has not proven causation and does not have significant or novel implications for clinical practice.
Aims: This study is a part of a randomised controlled trial comparing corticosteroid withdrawal versus standard immunosuppression in low-immunological-risk renal transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatching on early subclinical inflammation (SCI) in low-immunological-risk renal transplant patients.
Interventions: Participants in the original trial were randomised to either the prednisone continuation group or the prednisone withdrawal group.
Participants: 105 Caucasian renal transplant patients.
Outcomes: Association between HLA mismatches and SCI risk.
Follow Up: 3 months

The impact of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatching on the early appearance of subclinical inflammation (SCI) in low-immunological-risk kidney transplant (KT) recipients is undetermined. We aimed to assess whether HLA-mismatching (A-B-C-DR-DQ) is a risk factor for early SCI. As part of a clinical trial (Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT02284464), a total of 105 low-immunological-risk KT patients underwent a protocol biopsy on the third month post-KT. As a result, 54 presented SCI, showing a greater number of total HLA-mismatches (p = 0.008) and worse allograft function compared with the no inflammation group (48.5 ± 13.6 vs. 60 ± 23.4 mL/min; p = 0.003). Multiple logistic regression showed that the only risk factor associated with SCI was the total HLA-mismatch score (OR 1.32, 95%CI 1.06-1.64, p = 0.013) or class II HLA mismatching (OR 1.51; 95%CI 1.04-2.19, p = 0.032) after adjusting for confounder variables (recipient age, delayed graft function, transfusion prior KT, and tacrolimus levels). The ROC curve illustrated that the HLA mismatching of six antigens was the optimal value in terms of sensitivity and specificity for predicting the SCI. Finally, a significantly higher proportion of SCI was seen in patients with >6 vs. ≤6 HLA-mismatches (62.3 vs. 37.7%; p = 0.008). HLA compatibility is an independent risk factor associated with early SCI. Thus, transplant physicians should perhaps be more aware of HLA mismatching to reduce these early harmful lesions.

  • Colmenero J
  • Rodríguez-Perálvarez M
  • Salcedo M
  • Arias-Milla A
  • Muñoz-Serrano A
  • et al.
J Hepatol. 2021 Jan;74(1):148-155 doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.07.040.
BACKGROUND & AIMS:

The incidence and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in immunocompromised patients are a matter of debate.

METHODS:

We performed a prospective nationwide study including a consecutive cohort of liver transplant patients with COVID-19 recruited during the Spanish outbreak from 28 February to 7 April, 2020. The primary outcome was severe COVID-19, defined as the need for mechanical ventilation, intensive care, and/or death. Age- and gender-standardised incidence and mortality ratios (SIR and SMR) were calculated using data from the Ministry of Health and the Spanish liver transplant registry. Independent predictors of severe COVID-19 among hospitalised patients were analysed using multivariate Cox regression.

RESULTS:

A total of 111 liver transplant patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 (SIR = 191.2 [95% CI 190.3-192.2]). The epidemiological curve and geographic distribution overlapped widely between the liver transplant and general populations. After a median follow-up of 23 days, 96 patients (86.5%) were admitted to hospital and 22 patients (19.8%) required respiratory support. A total of 12 patients were admitted to the ICU (10.8%). The mortality rate was 18%, which was lower than in the matched general population (SMR = 95.5 [95% CI 94.2-96.8]). Overall, 35 patients (31.5%) met criteria of severe COVID-19. Baseline immunosuppression containing mycophenolate was an independent predictor of severe COVID-19 (relative risk = 3.94; 95% CI 1.59-9.74; p = 0.003), particularly at doses higher than 1,000 mg/day (p = 0.003). This deleterious effect was not observed with calcineurin inhibitors or everolimus and complete immunosuppression withdrawal showed no benefit.

CONCLUSIONS:

Being chronically immunosuppressed, liver transplant patients have an increased risk of acquiring COVID-19 but their mortality rates are lower than the matched general population. Upon hospital admission, mycophenolate dose reduction or withdrawal could help in preventing severe COVID-19. However, complete immunosuppression withdrawal should be discouraged.

LAY SUMMARY:

In liver transplant patients, chronic immunosuppression increases the risk of acquiring COVID-19 but it could reduce disease severity. Complete immunosuppression withdrawal may not be justified. However, mycophenolate withdrawal or temporary conversion to calcineurin inhibitors or everolimus until disease resolution could be beneficial in hospitalised patients.

  • Vazquez Sanchez T
  • Caballero A
  • Alonso-Titos J
  • Lopez V
  • Sola E
  • et al.
American Journal of Transplantation. 2020;20(suppl3).
American Transplant Congress, 30 May- 3 June 2020, Pennsylvania, USA
  • Vazquez T
  • Caballero A
  • Marques E
  • Esteban PR
  • Palma E
  • et al.
TTS 2018. 27th International Congress of The Transplantation Society. June 30-July 5 Madrid, Spain. Introduction Steroids represent a mainstay of immunosuppression after kidney transplant. The infiltration into the graft of active T cells following KT depends on the expression of chemokines and their interaction with their T-cell receptors. However, the natural history of the expression of these molecules in patients who undergo steroid withdrawal after transplant is unknown. Materials and Methods In a controlled clinical trial (NCT02284464), a total of 176 KT patients with low immunological risk were recruited to randomly receive either conventional triple immunosuppression: steroids, TAC and MMF (Group A) versus steroid withdrawal at the 3 post-KT month (Group B). We compared the evolution of CCR4highCD4+ and CXCR3highCD4+ lymphocyte subpopulations in graft blood (GB) extracted by fine needle aspiration puncture determined by flow cytometry in patients after steroid withdrawal at the 3 month post-KT versus patients who continue to receive conventional triple immunosuppression. Measurements were made at 3 (baseline) and 6 months post-KT in GB and in peripheral blood (PB). Results So far, 68 patients have been randomized (34 in each group). There were no significant differences in the clinical and demographic characteristics between the groups at baseline. The first analysis (at 3 months) in those patients who had completed 6 months of follow-up (Group A: n=13; Group B: n=15) showed a significant increase in the CCR4highCD4 subpopulations in GB versus PB in both groups. However, at six months a significant increase in GB versus PB was only seen in Group A. There were no significant differences in the CXCR3highCD4+ lymphocyte subpopulation at the third or sixth month between GB and PB in either group (Table). JOURNAL/trans/04.02/00007890-201807001-00969/table1-969/v/2018-08-28T120805Z/r/image-tiff Conclusion These preliminary results could suggest a possible effect of prednisone that would favor the recruitment of CCR4highCD4+ cells into the renal graft. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) (grant ICI14/00016) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III co-funded by the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional–FEDER, RETICS (REDINREN RD12/0021/0015, RD16/0009/0006). Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Vazquez T
  • Alonso-Titos J
  • Gamez JP
  • Esteban PR
  • Caballero A
  • et al.
TTS 2018. 27th International Congress of The Transplantation Society. June 30-July 5 Madrid, Spain. Introduction Steroids represent one of the mainstays of immunosuppression after kidney transplant (KT). Steroid withdrawal reduces metabolic and cardiovascular complications, but whether it increases the risk of acute rejection and the generation of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) is currently undetermined. Materials and Methods In a controlled clinical trial (NCT02284464), a total of 176 KT patients with low immunological risk were recruited to randomly receive either conventional triple immunosuppression: steroids, TAC and MMF versus steroid withdrawal at the third post-KT month. We compared the incidence of de novo DSA, determined by Luminex Mixed and Luminex Single Antigen (One Lambda®), and its impact on graft histology in patients with steroid withdrawal at the 3 post-KT month (after a protocol biopsy) versus patients who continue to receive conventional triple immunosuppression. Results So far, 68 patients have been randomized (34 per group), with no significant differences in the clinical and demographic characteristics between the groups. The intermediate analysis in those patients who had completed one year of follow-up (n=28) showed no significant differences in the formation of DSA (0% vs. 0%), nor was there rejection in those patients in whom prednisone was withdrawn after randomization. Patients with triple therapy showed a trend toward better renal function compared to those without steroids at the first post-KT year (1.29±0.25 vs. 1.56±0.42 mg/dL, P=0.088). HbA1c levels were similar between both group at the first post-KT year (5.79±0.59 vs. 5.68±0.81%, P=0.734). Conclusion The preliminary results show that steroid withdrawal at the 3 month post-KT seems safe when assessing the appearance of rejection and formation of DSA compared to the patients who continued to receive conventional triple immunosuppression. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) (grant ICI14/00016) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III co-funded by the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional–FEDER, RETICS (REDINREN RD12/0021/0015, RD16/0009/0006, RD16/0009/0003, RD16/0009/0030, RD16/0009/0031). Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Vazquez-Sanchez T
  • Caballero A
  • Ruiz-Esteban P
  • Sola E
  • Marques E
  • et al.
TTS 2018. 27th International Congress of The Transplantation Society. June 30-July 5 Madrid, Spain. Introduction Monocytes comprise a heterogeneous population divided according to the membrane expression level of their molecules. One of these populations is the CD14++CD16+, which presents proinflammatory characteristics. Our aim was to evaluate the role of this monocyte population in renal transplant recipients with borderline rejection. Material and Methods This controlled clinical trial (NCT02284464) recruited patients with a low immunological risk to randomly receive conventional triple therapy (steroids, TAC and MMF) versus steroid withdrawal three months after the protocol biopsy. We analysed 66 patients with either a normal histology or borderline rejection. In all the patients we studied pre-randomisation levels of CD14++CD16+ at the third month in peripheral blood (PB) and blood extracted from the graft by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAP). The monocytes were analysed by flow cytometry using CD14 and CD16 monoclonal antibodies. Results Of the 66 patients, 38 (51.1±12.8 years; 68.4% men) had a normal biopsy and 28 (57.8±9.5 years; 67.9% men) had borderline rejection. The percentage of proinflammatory monocytes was similar in the PB and FNAP samples from the patients with a normal biopsy (PB: 13.2±12.9 vs FNAP:16.3±14.3%; p=0.070). However, in the group with borderline rejection the difference in the percentage of these monocytes was significantly greater in the FNAP sample compared to the PB sample (PB: 7.9±5.4 vs FNAP: 16.9±16.5%; p=0.006). No differences were seen at the time of biopsy in renal function or proteinuria (Normal: Cr=1.6±0.6 vs Borderline: 1.7±0.5 mg/dL; p=0.536 and Normal: 268.2±197.9 vs Borderline: 269.3±239.8 mg/24h; p=0.986). Conclusion These preliminary results show that patients with a diagnosis of borderline rejection in the protocol biopsy present a significant difference in CD14++CD16+ monocytes between peripheral blood and graft blood, despite having a stable renal function. This suggests recruitment of these proinflammatory monocytes. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) (grant ICI14/00016) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III co-funded by the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional-FEDER, RETICS (REDINREN RD16/0009/0006). Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Alonso-Titos J
  • Ruiz-Esteban P
  • Palma E
  • Lopez V
  • Caballero A
  • et al.
18th Congress of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 24-27 September 2017, Barcelona, Spain. 2017.
18th Congress of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 24-27 September 2017, Barcelona, Spain
  • Alonso-Titos J
  • Ruiz-Esteban P
  • Palma E
  • Caballero,.A
  • Lopez V
  • et al.
18th Congress of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 24-27 September 2017, Barcelona, Spain. 2017.
18th Congress of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 24-27 September 2017, Barcelona, Spain