Advanced Search
Clear
10 results
Filters
Sort By
Results Per Page
Filters
Advanced Search
Clear
10 results
Download the following citations:
Email the following citations:
Print the following citations:
  • Chandraker A
  • Regmi A
  • Gohh R
  • Sharma A
  • Woodle ES
  • et al.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Mar 12; doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000329.
  • Raina R
  • Jothi S
  • Haffner D
  • Somers M
  • Filler G
  • et al.
Kidney Int. 2024 Mar;105(3):450-463 doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.017.

Focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS) is 1 of the primary causes of nephrotic syndrome in both pediatric and adult patients, which can lead to end-stage kidney disease. Recurrence of FSGS after kidney transplantation significantly increases allograft loss, leading to morbidity and mortality. Currently, there are no consensus guidelines for identifying those patients who are at risk for recurrence or for the management of recurrent FSGS. Our work group performed a literature search on PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, and recommendations were proposed and graded for strength of evidence. Of the 614 initially identified studies, 221 were found suitable to formulate consensus guidelines for recurrent FSGS. These guidelines focus on the definition, epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, and management of recurrent FSGS. We conclude that additional studies are required to strengthen the recommendations proposed in this review.

  • Heo S
  • Park Y
  • Lee N
  • Kim Y
  • Kim YN
  • et al.
Transplant Proc. 2022 Oct;54(8):2117-2124 doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.08.008.
CET Conclusion
Reviewer: Mr John O'Callaghan, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford
Conclusion: This is a small randomised controlled trial in Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR) of renal transplants. Patients with confirmed AMR were randomised to standard care (plasmapheresis and IVI Ig as prescribed by clinicians) or to eculizimab infusion. There were 11 patients included, so a relatively small number, but this would have been dependent on a low number of potential patients to include. The study commenced in 2013 and has only just come to publication. It is not clear that the study was adequately randomised, and there was also the possibility for patients to cross over to the other arm if treatment failed, which further confuses the results and interpretation. There was also considerable variation in additional treatments, such as the use of Campath, Basiliximab, Rituximab and ATG. The main conclusion to draw from this small study is that eculizumab alone did not reverse rejection in any case, prevent progression to chronic AMR or transplant glomerulopathy.
Aims: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of eculizumab versus plasmapheresis (PP) and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (IVIG) in kidney transplant patients with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).
Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to receive either eculizumab or standard of care (PP combined with IVIG).
Participants: 11 kidney transplant recipients between 18 and 75 years of age.
Outcomes: The main outcomes of interest were as follows: mean serum creatinine, rejection reversal, graft loss and serious adverse events.
Follow Up: 12 months
BACKGROUND:

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of eculizumab in comparison with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in renal transplant recipients diagnosed with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).

METHODS:

This was a multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized analysis. The patients were randomized by therapy type (eg, eculizumab infusions or standard of care [SOC]: plasmapheresis/intravenous immunoglobulin). The patients (ie, eculizumab arm: 7 patients, SOC arm: 4 patients) were evaluated for the continued presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and C4d (staining on biopsy), as well as histologic evidence, using repeat renal biopsy after treatment.

RESULTS:

The allograft biopsies revealed that eculizumab did not prevent the progression to transplant glomerulopathy. Only 2 patients in the SOC arm experienced rejection reversal, and no graft losses occurred in either group. After AMR treatment, the DSA titers generally decreased compared to titers taken at the time of AMR diagnosis. There were no serious adverse effects in the eculizumab arm.

CONCLUSIONS:

Eculizumab alone cannot treat AMR effectively and does not prevent acute AMR from progressing to chronic AMR or transplant glomerulopathy. However, it should be considered as a potential alternative therapy because it may be associated with decreased DSA levels.

  • Starling RC
  • Armstrong B
  • Bridges ND
  • Eisen H
  • Givertz MM
  • et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 9;74(1):36-51 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.056.
CET Conclusion
Reviewer: Mr John O'Callaghan, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, The Royal College of Surgeons of England.
Conclusion: This is a well written report of a good quality clinical trial in cardiac transplantation. The proposed hypothesis was that Rituximab treatment would prevent cardiac allograft vasculopathy compared to placebo following heart transplantation, by depleting B-cells and preventing antibody-mediated damage. Both the treatment arm and control arm received standard immune suppression post-operatively with tacrolimus, mycophenolate and tapering steroids (or alternatives at local investigators’ discretion). The study was adequately powered based on previous results. Unfortunately there are no details in the report of the method of randomisation or how blinding was maintained. The primary outcome was the mean change in percent atheroma volume at one year, as assessed by intra-vascular ultrasound. This outcome was significantly worse in the Rituximab arm, an unexpected outcome. There were no significant clinical outcomes associated with this (such as retransplantation, rejection or death) but the study was not powered for these. There was a similar proportion of patients who developed anti-HLA antibodies in both arms. It is speculated that certain B-cells have a regulatory function and the depletion with Rituximab can lead to other cell phenotypes filling the void. Whilst the authors would not discourage the use of Rituximab in cardiac transplantation to treat antibody mediated rejection, or PTLD, they agree that Rituximab should be avoided as induction therapy for non-sensitized cardiac transplant recipients.
Aims: This study aimed to identify whether B cell depletion therapy would decrease the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.
Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either rituximab 1000mg intravenous or placebo on days 3 and 12 post-heart transplantation.
Participants: 163 heart transplant recipients (age: 18-75 years).
Outcomes: The primary outcome of this study was change in percent of atheroma volume (PAV) from baseline to one year. Secondary outcomes assessed included treated episodes of acute rejection, de novo anti-HLA antibodies and phenotypic differentiation of B cells.
Follow Up: 1 year
BACKGROUND:

The CTOT-11 (Prevention of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Using Rituximab Therapy in Cardiac Transplantation [Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-11]) study was a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, double-blinded clinical trial in nonsensitized primary heart transplant (HTX) recipients.

OBJECTIVES:

The study sought to determine whether B cell depletion therapy would attenuate the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

METHODS:

A total of 163 HTX recipients were randomized to rituximab 1,000 mg intravenous or placebo on days 0 and 12 post-transplant. Primary outcome was change in percent atheroma volume (PAV) from baseline to 1 year measured by intravascular ultrasound. Secondary outcomes included treated episodes of acute rejection, de novo anti-HLA antibodies (including donor-specific antibodies), and phenotypic differentiation of B cells.

RESULTS:

There were no significant differences at study entry between the rituximab and placebo groups. Paired intravascular ultrasound measures were available at baseline and 1 year in 86 subjects (49 rituximab, 37 placebo). The mean ± SD change in PAV at 12 months was +6.8 ± 8.2% rituximab versus +1.9 ± 4.4% placebo (p = 0.0019). Mortality at 12 months was 3.4% rituximab versus 6.8% placebo (p = 0.47); there were no retransplants or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. The rate of treated rejection was 24.7% rituximab versus 32.4% placebo (p = 0.28). Rituximab therapy effectively eliminated CD20+/CD19+ B cells followed by a gradual expansion of a CD19- cell population in the rituximab-treated group.

CONCLUSIONS:

A marked, unexpected increase in coronary artery PAV with rituximab was observed during the first year in HTX recipients. One-year mortality was not impacted; however, longer-term follow-up and mechanistic explanations are required. (Prevention of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Using Rituximab [Rituxan] Therapy in Cardiac Transplantation; NCT01278745).

  • Chandraker A
  • Kobashigawa J
  • Stehlik J
  • Givertz M
  • Pierson R
  • et al.
American Transplant Congress, June 11-15, 2016, Boston, America.. 2016.
American Transplant Congress, June 11-15, 2016, Boston, America.
  • Lee BT
  • Gabardi S
  • Grafals M
  • Hofmann RM
  • Akalin E
  • et al.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Mar;9(3):583-9 doi: 10.2215/CJN.04230413.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:

BK virus reactivation in kidney transplant recipients can lead to progressive allograft injury. Reduction of immunosuppression remains the cornerstone of treatment for active BK infection. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics are known to have in vitro antiviral properties, but the evidence for their use in patients with BK viremia is inconclusive. The objective of the study was to determine the efficacy of levofloxacin in the treatment of BK viremia.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS:

Enrollment in this prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial occurred from July 2009 to March 2012. Thirty-nine kidney transplant recipients with BK viremia were randomly assigned to receive levofloxacin, 500 mg daily, or placebo for 30 days. Immunosuppression in all patients was adjusted on the basis of standard clinical practices at each institution. Plasma BK viral load and serum creatinine were measured monthly for 3 months and at 6 months.

RESULTS:

At the 3-month follow-up, the percentage reductions in BK viral load were 70.3% and 69.1% in the levofloxacin group and the placebo group, respectively (P=0.93). The percentage reductions in BK viral load were also equivalent at 1 month (58% versus and 67.1%; P=0.47) and 6 months (82.1% versus 90.5%; P=0.38). Linear regression analysis of serum creatinine versus time showed no difference in allograft function between the two study groups during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS:

A 30-day course of levofloxacin does not significantly improve BK viral load reduction or allograft function when used in addition to overall reduction of immunosuppression.

  • De Serres S
  • Mfarrej B
  • Guleria I
  • Najafaian N
  • Morrison Y
  • et al.
American Society of Nephrology Renal Week 2010 - Denver, Colorado.. 2010.
American Society of Nephrology Renal Week - Denver, Colorado. November 16 - 21
  • Chandraker A
  • De Serres S
  • Mfarrej B
  • Gueleria I
  • Dyer C
  • et al.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:348a.
American Society of Nephrology Renal Week 2009 - San Diego, CA October 27 - November 1, 2009
  • Chandraker A
  • Mfarrej B
  • De Serres S
  • Guleria I
  • Dyer C
  • et al.
American Transplant Congress 2009, May 30 - June 3, Boston MA. 2009.
American Transplant Congress 2009, May 30 - June 3, Boston MA
  • Goggins WC
  • Pascual MA
  • Powelson JA
  • Magee C
  • Tolkoff-Rubin N
  • et al.
Transplantation. 2003 Sep 15;76(5):798-802 doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000081042.67285.91.
BACKGROUND:

Delayed graft function (DGF) is frequently observed in recipients of cadaveric renal transplants. Previous retrospective or nonrandomized studies have suggested that intraoperative administration of polyclonal antithymocyte preparations may reduce the incidence of DGF, possibly by decreasing ischemia-reperfusion injury.

METHODS:

We performed a prospective randomized study of Thymoglobulin induction therapy in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients. Between January 2001 and January 2002, 58 adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients were randomized to receive intraoperative or postoperative Thymoglobulin induction therapy. Three to six doses of Thymoglobulin (1 mg/kg/dose) were administered during the first week posttransplant. Baseline immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus (54 of 58) or cyclosporine A (4 of 58), steroids, and mycophenolate mofetil. DGF was defined by the requirement for hemodialysis within the first week posttransplant.

RESULTS:

There were no significant differences between the two groups in recipient demographics, donor age, cold ischemia time, or total number of doses of Thymoglobulin administered. Intraoperative Thymoglobulin administration was associated with significantly less DGF and a lower mean serum creatinine on postoperative days 10 and 14 (P<0.05). Posttransplant length of stay was also significantly shorter for the intraoperative Thymoglobulin patient group. The acute rejection rate was also lower in the intraoperative treatment group but this did not achieve statistical significance. There was no difference in the incidence of cytomegalovirus disease between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of this study indicate that intraoperative Thymoglobulin administration, in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients, is associated with a significant decrease in DGF, better early allograft function in the first month posttransplant, and a decreased posttransplant hospital length of stay.