INTRODUCTION:

Despite the high incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) among high-risk recipients, no studies have investigated its prevention by immunosuppression optimization.

METHODS:

We conducted an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial testing whether a tacrolimus-based immunosuppression and rapid steroid withdrawal (SW) within 1 week (Tac-SW) or cyclosporine A (CsA) with steroid minimization (SM) (CsA-SM), decreased the incidence of PTDM compared with tacrolimus with SM (Tac-SM). All arms received basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil. High risk was defined by age >60 or >45 years plus metabolic criteria based on body mass index, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels. The primary endpoint was the incidence of PTDM after 12 months.

RESULTS:

The study comprised 128 de novo renal transplant recipients without pretransplant diabetes (Tac-SW: 44, Tac-SM: 42, CsA-SM: 42). The 1-year incidence of PTDM in each arm was 37.8% for Tac-SW, 25.7% for Tac-SM, and 9.7% for CsA-SM (relative risk [RR] Tac-SW vs. CsA-SM 3.9 [1.2-12.4; P = 0.01]; RR Tac-SM vs. CsA-SM 2.7 [0.8-8.9; P = 0.1]). Antidiabetic therapy was required less commonly in the CsA-SM arm (P = 0.06); however, acute rejection rate was higher in CsA-SM arm (Tac-SW 11.4%, Tac-SM 4.8%, and CsA-SM 21.4% of patients; cumulative incidence P = 0.04). Graft and patient survival, and graft function were similar among arms.

CONCLUSION:

In high-risk patients, tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with SM provides the best balance between PTDM and acute rejection incidence.

BACKGROUND:

Bone loss occurs during the first 6 months after renal transplantation (RT), and corticosteroid therapy plays an important role. Although calcium plus vitamin D administration prevents corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, its use in RT recipients is limited by the risk of hypercalcemia.

METHODS:

This double-blind, randomized, and controlled prospective intervention trial examined the effect of intermittent calcitriol (0.5 microg/48 h) during the first 3 months after RT, plus oral calcium supplementation (0.5 g/day) during 1 year with calcium supplementation alone. The primary outcome measure was the change in bone mineral density (BMD) at 3 and 12 months after RT; we also explored whether the effect of calcitriol on BMD was different among vitamin D receptor (VDR) genotypes (BsmI). Forty-five recipients were randomized to calcitriol therapy (CT) and 41 were randomized to placebo (PL).

RESULTS:

Both groups had a similar degree of pre-existing hyperparathyroidism (197 +/- 229 vs. 191 +/- 183 pg/mL), but a more pronounced decrease of parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels after RT was observed in CT patients (at 3 months: 61.4 +/- 42.2 vs. 85.7 +/- 53.1 pg/mL, P= 0.02; at 12 months: 67.3 +/- 33.7 vs. 82.6 +/- 37 pg/mL; P= 0.08). CT patients preserved their BMD at the total hip significantly better than those on PL (3 months: 0.04 +/- 3.3 vs. -1.93 +/- 3.2%, P= 0.01; 12 months: 0.32 +/- 4.8 vs. -2.17 +/- 4.4%, P= 0.03); significant differences were noted at the intertrochanter, trochanter, and Ward's triangle. Differences did not reach significance at the femoral neck. Two CT patients (4.4%) and 4 PL patients (9.8%) developed a hypercalcemic episode during the first 3 months after RT. The effect of CT on BMD at 3 months was more prominent in recipients with the at-risk allele of the VDR gene (P= 0.03).

CONCLUSION:

Therapy with low-dose calcium supplements during 1 year, plus intermittent calcitriol for 3 months after RT, is safe, decreases PTH levels more rapidly, and prevents bone loss at the proximal femur; a more pronounced effect is seen in recipients with at least one at-risk allele of the VDR genotype.

BACKGROUND:

Dietary fish oil, rich in omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, decreases TNF-alpha, IL-1beta and IL-2 levels, which may benefit renal transplant recipients. To explore this possibility, we studied the effect of fish oil on the incidence of acute rejection, in situ expression of interleukins (TNF-alpha, IL-1beta and IL-2) and renal function after renal transplantation.

METHODS:

In a double-blind clinical trial, 86 subjects with no immunological risk randomly received either 6 g/day of fish oil (fish oil group; n=46) or soy oil (control group; n=40) during the first 3 months after transplantation. The mRNA expression of interleukins (TNF-alpha, IL-1beta and IL-2) was determined by RT-PCR using fine-needle aspiration during follow-up (at baseline and the 1st, 2nd and 3rd month after renal transplantation), as well as during acute rejection episodes and after anti-rejection therapy. The glomerular filtration rate was determined at baseline, and at 1 and 3 months post-graft by [(51)Cr]EDTA clearances.

RESULTS:

The incidence of acute rejection during the first post-transplant year was similar in both groups (44 vs. 47%), as was 1-year graft survival (86 vs. 89%). There were no differences between groups in overall renal expression of interleukins in patients who did not suffer rejections during the study. At rejection episodes, the fish oil group showed a trend toward a lower renal expression of TNF-alpha (3.7+/-6.8 vs. 15+/-18.6 TNF-alpha/actin, ratio of arbitrary optical units; P=0.05). In addition, a trend toward a lower IL-1beta expression after therapy was observed in the fish oil group (49.3+/-54 vs. 84.4+/-59 IL-1beta/actin, ratio of arbitrary optical units; P=0.05). However, the severity of acute rejections (Banff criteria) as well as renal function after anti-rejection treatment were similar in both groups. Finally, a greater reduction in triglyceride levels was observed in the fish oil group compared with the control group (-6.6+/-52.7 vs. 12.7+/-40.2%; P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Treatment with fish oil during the first 3 months post-transplantation does not influence acute rejection rate and has no beneficial effect on renal function or graft survival.

BACKGROUND:

Cardiac complications are the main cause of death in renal transplantation (RT), and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) may play an important role in these patients. The unfavorable genotype of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been associated with cardiovascular disease, including LVH. ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) reduce LVH, but little is known about the effects of ACEIs on LVH in RT patients with different insertion/deletion (I/D) genotypes of the ACE gene.

METHODS:

We prospectively studied 57 stable nondiabetic RT patients with hypertension and echocardiographic LVH as well as a functional graft for 69.5 +/- 5.6 months. Patients randomly received either lisinopril 10 mg/day (group A, N = 29; 5 were excluded due to reversible acute renal failure) or placebo (group B, N = 28) for 12 months. Echocardiography (M-mode, 2-B, and color flow Doppler) was performed at baseline and 6 and 12 months later by the same examiner without previous knowledge of the genetic typing. The ACE genotype (I or D alleles) was ascertained by polymerase chain reaction (PCR; group A, DD = 10 and ID/II = 14; group B, DD = 15 and ID/II = 13).

RESULTS:

All patients maintained a good renal function (serum creatinine <2.5 mg/dL) during the follow-up and both groups received a similar proportion of antihypertensive drugs (beta-blockers 83 vs. 79%; Ca antagonists 66 vs. 68%; alpha1-adrenoreceptor antagonists 50 vs. 67%) during the study. As expected, mean arterial blood pressure and hemoglobin levels showed a higher percentage reduction in group A versus group B (-4 +/- 2.8 vs. 2.1 +/- 2.6%, P = 0.07, and -11.5 +/- 1.5 vs. -0.5 +/- 2.3%, P < 0.01, respectively). Group A patients showed a significantly higher decrement in LV mass index (LVMI) than group B at the end of follow-up, after adjusting for age, baseline LVMI, time after grafting and changes in systolic blood pressure, renal function, and hemoglobin levels (group A, -9.5 +/- 3.5% vs. group B, 3 +/- 3.2%, P < 0.05). As a result, 46% of group A and only 7% of group B patients showed a reduction of LVMI >/=15% (P < 0.01). The beneficial effect of lisinopril on LVMI reduction was more evident in DD patients (placebo DD, 8.4 +/- 4.1% vs. lisinopril DD, -7.2 +/- 5.3, P < 0.05), and a trend was observed in patients with other genotypes (placebo ID/II, 2.8 +/- 5.4% vs. lisinopril ID/II, -11.4 +/- 5%, P = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS:

Lisinopril decreases LVM in renal transplant patients with hypertension and LVH, and the ACE gene polymorphism may predict the beneficial effect of this therapy. This finding may be important in targeting prophylactic interventions in this population.

33rd Annual Meeting. American Society of Nephrology. Toronto, Canada. 10-16 Oct 2000

American Society of Nephrology, 31st Annual Meeting, October 25-28, 1998, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

American Society of Nephrology, 30th Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, November 2-5, 1997