11 results
Filters • 3
Sort By
Results Per Page
Filters
11 results
3
Download the following citations:
Email the following citations:
Print the following citations:
See all 1 Highlighted Expert Reviews articles matching your criteria
...
  • Grabinski ZG
  • Boscamp NS
  • Zuckerman WA
  • Zviti R
  • O'Brien A
  • et al.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Feb 1;38(2):e811-e815 doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002458.
OBJECTIVE:

Distraction can reduce pain and distress associated with painful procedures but has never been studied in children with solid organ transplants. We aimed to determine whether there is a difference in pain and distress associated with venipuncture in pediatric posttransplant patients who receive distraction compared with those who do not.

METHODS:

Randomized controlled trial of children aged 4 to 17 years with solid organ transplants undergoing venipuncture in the outpatient setting. Patients were randomized to receive distraction or no distraction. The primary outcome was the Faces Pain Scale-Revised. Secondary outcomes were the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress-Revised; Faces, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability; and Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale. Exploratory outcomes included the number of venipuncture attempts, time to successful venipuncture, and satisfaction of phlebotomists and parents.

RESULTS:

Median age of the 40 children enrolled was 11.5 years. Type of transplants included the heart (67.5%), kidney (22.5%), liver (7.5%), and more than 1 organ (2.5%). There was no difference between the Faces Pain Scale-Revised scores in distraction and no distraction groups (1.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-1.9; and 1.3, 95% confidence interval, 0.5-2.1, respectively). There was also no difference in the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress-Revised; Faces, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability; and Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale scores, number of venipuncture attempts, or time to successful venipuncture. Phlebotomists were more satisfied with the venipuncture when distraction was implemented.

CONCLUSIONS:

In children with solid organ transplants, there was no difference in pain and distress associated with venipuncture between those who did and did not receive distraction. There was also no difference in other procedure-related outcomes except for greater phlebotomist satisfaction when distraction was implemented.

  • Steenaart E
  • Crutzen R
  • de Vries NK
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 20;20(1):739 doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08900-5.
BACKGROUND:

As organ donation registration rates remain low, especially among lower-educated people, it is important to support this group in making their registration decision. To prepare lower-educated students in the Netherlands for making a well-informed decision, an interactive educational program was developed. We aim to understand both the (quality of) implementation as well as to contextualize the effects of this program in a lower-educated school setting.

METHODS:

The process evaluation was part of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial, in which 11 schools for Intermediate Vocational Education throughout the Netherlands participated. Teachers who taught a course on Citizenship delivered three intervention elements (i.e. video fragments and discussion, quizzes with tailored feedback and an exercise filling out a registration form) to their students. Implementation was assessed by interviews with teachers, questionnaires from students, logbooks from teachers and user data from Google Analytics.

RESULTS:

The program was well received and implemented, but on-the-spot adaptations were made by teachers to fit their students better. Within the lower-educated target group, differences between students are high in terms of active participation, reading abilities, knowledge and attention span. The program fit well within their regular teaching activities, but the topic of organ donation is not always prioritized by teachers.

CONCLUSIONS:

We see opportunities to disseminate the program on a larger scale and reach a group that has been neglected in organ donation education before. Within the program, there are possibilities to increase the effectiveness of the program, such as alternative delivery methods for the elements with a lot of text, the addition of booster sessions and guidelines for teachers to adapt the program to students of different levels within Intermediate Vocational Education. Moreover, in order to have an impact on a national level, strategies need to be employed to reach high numbers of students and, therefore, support on a higher level is needed (both within schools and at policy level).

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

Dutch Trial Register, NTR6771. Prospectively registered on 24 October 2017.

  • Lerret SM
  • White-Traut R
  • Medoff-Cooper B
  • Simpson P
  • Adib R
  • et al.
Res Nurs Health. 2020 Apr;43(2):145-154 doi: 10.1002/nur.22010.
CET Conclusion
Reviewer: Dr Liset Pengel, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford
Conclusion: This is the protocol of a pilot study that aims to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a family self-management intervention. The myFAMI intervention facilitates and supports family management of the child and communication between the family and the health care team. Families of 40 paediatric heart, kidney and liver transplant recipients from three paediatric transplant centres will be randomised to myFAMI or control according to a table of random numbers. The control and intervention groups receive standard care. The myFAMI intervention includes using an app to promote daily communication for 30 days postdischarge. Family members are prompted to answer daily questions regarding coping, care at home and management of the transplant symptoms, e.g. pain or fever. Critical responses will trigger a call from the nurse. The study will report on myFAMI-app use (target completion rate of daily questions by family members is at least 80%), frequency of daily alerts and timing of nurse responses to these alerts, postdischarge coping according to the postdischarge coping difficulty scale, and the additional outcomes self-efficacy, self-management behaviour and quality of life. So far, 21 families have been randomised and the pilot study will continue until 40 families are recruited. The authors describe the challenges regarding study recruitment and procedures and lessons learned to date.
Aims: To evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the family self-management intervention called myFAMI.
Interventions: A family self-management (myFAMI) intervention versus control. The myFAMI intervention includes an app to promote daily communication about coping, beliefs about complex care at home and managing the child’s transplant symptoms. Both interventions received standard care included educational material, medication teaching sheets and teaching by the transplant team before hospital discharge.
Participants: 40 families (2 family members per family) of paediatric heart, kidney and liver transplant recipients from three US paediatric transplant centres.
Outcomes: myFAMI-app use, frequency of daily alerts and timing of nurse responses to these alerts, postdischarge coping according to the postdischarge coping difficulty scale. Other outcomes include self-efficacy, self-management behaviour and quality of life.
Follow Up: 30 days post hospital discharge

Solid-organ transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage organ failure. Parents of pediatric transplant recipients who reported a lack of readiness for discharge had more difficulty coping and managing their child's medically complex care at home. In this paper, we describe the protocol for the pilot study of a mHealth intervention (myFAMI). The myFAMI intervention is based on the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory and focuses on family self-management of pediatric transplant recipients at home. The purpose of the pilot study is to test the feasibility of the myFAMI intervention with family members of pediatric transplant recipients and to test the preliminary efficacy on postdischarge coping through a randomized controlled trial. The sample will include 40 family units, 20 in each arm of the study, from three pediatric transplant centers in the United States. Results from this study may advance nursing science by providing insight for the use of mHealth to facilitate patient/family-nurse communication and family self-management behaviors for family members of pediatric transplant recipients.

  • Vondrak K
  • Parisi F
  • Dhawan A
  • Grenda R
  • Webb NJA
  • et al.
Clin Transplant. 2019 Oct;33(10):e13698 doi: 10.1111/ctr.13698.
CET Conclusion
Reviewer: Mr John O'Callaghan, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford
Conclusion: Given that there is little information published about prolonged release tacrolimus in paediatric transplant patients so this is an important Phase-2, open-label, study. It included recipients of heart, kidney and liver transplants randomised to immediate-release (twice daily) or prolonged-release (once-daliy) tacrolimus. The early (4-week) pharmacokinetic study has previously been published and this paper concentrates on the longer-term follow up at 1 year. Each centre was able to give the rest of their routine immune suppression regimen as required. Over one year of follow up the mean tacrolimus doses and trough levels were similar between the two arms of the study. In the prolonged-release arm there was 1 case of biopsy confirmed rejection (BCAR) in a liver recipient and 1 case of clinical rejection in a heart recipient. In the immediate-release arm there were 4 cases of BCAR in liver recipients, 1 case of clinical rejection in a heart recipient and 2 kidney recipients. There were no cases of graft loss or death during the study period. There was no significant difference in the composite end-point of “efficacy failure” although it appeared to favour the prolonged-release preparation. However, this was due to the inclusion of patients with unknown outcome that left the study early (removed consent, other adverse outcome, non-compliant with study visits). There was no significance in overall adverse events or drug-related adverse events. It should be noted that the study targeted older children and hence the median age is 10.6 years and 95% were Caucasian.
Aims: To compare efficacy and safety of immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-T) vs prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T) in de novo kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients.
Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either prolonged-release tacrolimus or immediate-release tacrolimus within 4 days of surgery.
Participants: 44 solid organ transplant recipients.
Outcomes: Safety, efficacy, and tacrolimus trough level data were obtained during follow-up visits on Day 60, 90, 180, and 365. The efficacy endpoints after 365 days measured the number of clinical acute rejections, BCAR episodes (including severity), patient and graft survival, and efficacy failure (a composite endpoint of death, graft loss, BCAR, or unknown outcome).
Follow Up: 1 year
BACKGROUND AND AIMS:

This multicenter trial compared immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-T) vs prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T) in de novo kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients aged <16 years. Each formulation had similar pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles. Follow-up efficacy and safety results are reported herein.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Patients, randomized 1:1, received once-daily, PR-T or twice-daily, IR-T within 4 days of surgery. After a 4-week PK assessment, patients continued randomized treatment for 48 additional weeks. At Year 1, efficacy assessments included the number of clinical acute rejections, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) episodes (including severity), patient and graft survival, and efficacy failure (composite of death, graft loss, BCAR, or unknown outcome). Adverse events were assessed throughout.

RESULTS:

The study included 44 children. At Year 1, mean ± standard deviation tacrolimus trough levels were 6.6 ± 2.2 and 5.4 ± 1.6 ng/mL, and there were 2 and 7 acute rejection episodes in the PR-T and IR-T groups, respectively. No cases of graft loss or death were reported during the study. The overall efficacy failure rate was 18.2% (PR-T n = 1; IR-T n = 7).

CONCLUSIONS:

In pediatric de novo solid organ recipients, the low incidence of BCAR and low efficacy failure rate suggest that PR-T-based immunosuppression is effective and well tolerated to 1-year post-transplantation.

  • Min S
  • Papaz T
  • Lafreniere-Roula M
  • Nalli N
  • Grasemann H
  • et al.
Pediatr Transplant. 2018 Nov;22(7):e13285 doi: 10.1111/petr.13285.
CET Conclusion
Reviewer: Mr Simon Knight, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, The Royal College of Surgeons of England.
Conclusion: This small pilot study from Toronto investigated the role of genotype- and age-adjusted tacrolimus dosing in paediatric transplant recipients. Patients were randomised to standard or adjusted dosing and followed in the early post-transplant period. Patients with adjusted dosing achieved target concentrations sooner (albeit by 1.3 days on average) and had less out-of-range concentrations than those starting on a standard dose. These results suggest that adjusted dosing in a paediatric population may be beneficial. The study is small and the population heterogeneous (including liver, heart and kidney recipients) with few CYP3A5 non-expressors. A larger study is now needed to see if the benefits in achieving target concentration more rapidly result in improved clinical outcomes. Given the increasing use of depleting antibody induction therapy, this may perhaps be less critical than the authors imply.
Aims: To determine whether age and CYP3A5 genotype-guided starting dose of tacrolimus after pediatric transplantation result in earlier attainment of therapeutic drug concentrations.
Interventions: Both groups of recipiants received starting dose of tacrolimus for 36-48 hours from a trial supply of commercially available tacrolimus. Genotype-guided dosing used a sliding scale algorithm with the lowest dose in older (>6 years) CYP3A5 nonexpressors and the highest dose in younger (≤6 years) CYP3A5 expressors. Participants were switched to clinical dosing after the first 36-48 hours.
Participants: 53 participants were randomized after transplantation in a 2:1 ratio to genotype-guided dosing (n=35) versus standard dosing (n=18). Randomization was stratified by genotype (expressor versus nonexpressor) and by organ type (liver versus nonliver).
Outcomes: The primary outcome was time to achieve therapeutic tacrolimus trough concentrations and to maintain stable therapeutic trough concentrations (without dose adjustment). Additional outcomes included tacrolimus concentration/dose ratio, frequency of out-of- range concentrations, frequency of dose adjustments, and tacrolimus AUC. Frequency of AEs was a secondary safety outcome.
Follow Up: 30 ± 3 days after tacrolimus initiation.
BACKGROUND:

Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics are influenced by age and CYP3A5 genotype with CYP3A5 expressors (CYP3A5*1/*1 or *1/*3) being fast metabolizers. However, the benefit of genotype-guided dosing in pediatric solid organ transplantation has been understudied.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine whether age and CYP3A5 genotype-guided starting dose of tacrolimus result in earlier attainment of therapeutic drug concentrations.

SETTING:

Single hospital-based transplant center.

METHODS:

This was a randomized, semi-blinded, 30-day pilot trial. Between 2012 and 2016, pediatric patients listed for solid organ transplant were consented and enrolled into the study. Participants were categorized as expressors, CYP3A5*1/*1 or CYP3A5*1/*3, and nonexpressors, CYP3A5*3/*3. Patients were stratified by age (≤ or > 6 years) and randomized (2:1) after transplant to receive genotype-guided (n = 35) or standard (n = 18) starting dose of tacrolimus for 36-48 hours and were followed for 30 days.

RESULTS:

Median age at transplant in the randomized cohort was 2.1 (0.75-8.0) years; 24 (45%) were male. Participants in the genotype-guided arm achieved therapeutic concentrations earlier at a median (IQR) of 3.4 (2.5-6.6) days compared to those in the standard dosing arm of 4.7 (3.5-8.6) days (P = 0.049), and had fewer out-of-range concentrations [OR (95% CI) = 0.60 (0.44, 0.83), P = 0.002] compared to standard dosing, with no difference in frequency of adverse events between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

CYP3A5 genotype-guided dosing stratified by age resulted in earlier attainment of therapeutic tacrolimus concentrations and fewer out-of-range concentrations.

  • GiaQuinta S
  • Michaels MG
  • McCullers JA
  • Wang L
  • Fonnesbeck C
  • et al.
Pediatr Transplant. 2015 Mar;19(2):219-28 doi: 10.1111/petr.12419.
CET Conclusion
Reviewer: Sir Peter Morris, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, The Royal College of Surgeons of England.
Conclusion: This is an important phase I study comparing vaccination with high dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine to a standard dose vaccine in paediatric patients between 3-17 years of age and at least 6 months after a solid organ transplant. 38 paediatric recipients were enrolled with a mean age of 11.25 years and were recipients of heart, liver, lung and intestinal transplants, the majority being renal, heart and liver. No severe adverse events were reported and in particular there was no evidence of rejection occurring after vaccination. There were more local symptoms in the high dose group and more systemic symptoms again in the high dose group. However there was a much higher percentage of a significant rise in titre in the high dose group compared to the standard dose group, against H3N2. The authors conclude that the high dose vaccine was well tolerated and may have increased in immunogenicity and recommend that a larger phase II study be carried out.
Expert Review
Reviewer: Dr Richard Trompeter, UCL Centre for Nephrology, The Royal Free Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom
Conflicts of Interest: No
Clinical Impact Rating 4
Review: There still exists an important balance between morbidity and mortality associated with viral illness versus any potential adverse effects of a vaccine when administered to a paediatric recipient of a solid organ transplant. Any forward step in providing an answer to this question has to be considered a benefit for clinical practice. In this small, two centre, prospective randomized double blind phase 1 study, safety and immunogenicity between a standard dose and a high dose inactivated influenza vaccine were compared for both safety and immunogenicity. Although there were more immediate local and systemic reactions when compared to the group who received the standard vaccine the cohort who received the high dose exhibited an impressive rise in the protective titre to H3N2 suggesting a benefit. Graft rejection was not associated with either form of rejection in this clinical trial.The authors point out important limitations to this study, specifically the small number of patients recruited i.e. 60, and that those who received the high dose vaccine had a higher mean age, possibly affecting immune response. The study was subject to a two week halt rule. This was designed so that the first 15 subjects enrolled could be monitored for allograft rejection, this necessarily delayed enrolment. The authors advocate that a phase 2 trial is now needed to assess immunogenicity of the high dose vaccine in this varied group of solid organ transplant recipients i.e. kidney, liver, heart lung and intestine all of who receive a different immunosuppressive regimen. The international paediatric transplant community should rise to the challenge.
Aims: To compare standard-dose (SD) versus high-dose (HD) trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in paediatric solid organ transplant patients.
Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive 0.5 mL of either the HD (60 µg) or SD (15 µg) trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) intramuscularly. Subjects <9 yr. of age received either one or two doses of the vaccine based on the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations.
Participants: 38 paediatric patients between the ages of three and seventeen.
Outcomes: The primary outcome measures were safety and the frequency of solicited local and systemic reactogenicity, adverse events, and serious adverse events. The secondary outcome measures were immunogenicity and the comparison of the geometric mean titer of hemagglutination inhibition titers, percent of children who develop hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers ≥1:40, and percent of children who develop seroconversion.
Follow Up: 180 days

Children who have undergone SOT mount a lower immune response after vaccination with TIV compared to healthy controls. HD or SD TIV in pediatric SOT was given to subjects 3-17 yr and at least six months post-transplant. Subjects were randomized 2:1 to receive either the HD (60 μg) or the SD (15 μg) TIV. Local and systemic reactions were solicited after each vaccination, and immune responses were measured before and after each vaccination. Thirty-eight subjects were enrolled. Mean age was 11.25 yr; 68% male, 45% renal, 26% heart, 21% liver, 5% lung, and 5% intestinal. Twenty-three subjects were given HD and 15 SD TIV. The median time since transplant receipt was 2.2 yr. No severe AEs or rejection was attributed to vaccination. The HD group reported more tenderness and local reactions, fatigue, and body ache when compared to the SD cohort, but these were considered mild and resolved within three days. Subjects in the HD group demonstrated a higher percentage of four-fold titer rise to H3N2 compared to the SD group. HD influenza vaccine was well tolerated and may have increased immunogenicity. A phase 2 trial is needed to confirm.

  • ACRE Trial Collaborators
  • Acre Trial Collaborators
BMJ. 2009 Oct 8;339:b3911 doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3911.
Aims: To investigate whether collaborative requesting, ie a request for organ donation by both the patient’s clinician and the donor transplant coordinator, increases consent for organ donation from the relatives of patients declared dead by criteria for brain stem death.
Interventions: A request for organ donation by both the clinical team and a donor transplant coordinator (collaborative request) compared with a request by the clinical team alone (routine request).
Participants: 201 relatives of patients declared dead by criteria for brain stem death or awaiting brain stem death testing who were to be approached regarding organ donation.
Outcomes: The primary outcome was the proportion of relatives giving consent to organ donation. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of potential donors from whom each type of solid organ was retrieved and transplanted, and the proportion from whom tissues were retrieved.
Follow Up: The primary outcome was assessed soon after the randomisation.
OBJECTIVE:

To determine whether collaborative requesting increases consent for organ donation from the relatives of patients declared dead by criteria for brain stem death.

DESIGN:

Unblinded multicentre randomised controlled trial using a sequential design. Centralised 24 hour telephone randomisation based on randomised permuted blocks of 10.

SETTING:

79 general, neuroscience, and paediatric intensive care units in the United Kingdom.

PARTICIPANTS:

201 relatives of patients meeting criteria for brain stem death. Relatives were blind to the intervention and to the trial; all other participants were necessarily unblinded.

INTERVENTIONS:

Collaborative requesting for consent for organ donation by the potential donor's clinician and a donor transplant coordinator (organ procurement officer) compared with routine requesting by the clinical team alone.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:

Proportion of relatives consenting to organ donation.

RESULTS:

101 relatives were randomised to routine requesting and 100 to collaborative requesting. All were analysed on an intention to treat basis. In the routine requesting group, 62 relatives consented to organ donation. In the collaborative requesting group, 57 relatives consented. After correction for the ethnicity, age, and sex of the potential donors the risk adjusted ratio of the odds of consent in the collaborative requesting group relative to the routine group was 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.43 to 1.53), with a P value of 0.49 adjusted for interim analysis and trial over-running. The conversion rate (donors with consent from whom any organs were retrieved) was 92% (57/62) in the routine requesting group and 79% (45/57) in the collaborative requesting group (P=0.043). There were 140 approaches to relatives in the per protocol analysis, leading to 60.3% (44/73) consent after routine and 67.2% (45/67) after collaborative requesting (risk adjusted odds ratio of consent 1.47, 0.67 to 3.20, P=0.33).

CONCLUSION:

There is no increase in consent rates for organ donation when collaborative requesting is used in place of routine requesting by the patient's clinician.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

ISRCTN01169903.

  • Humar A
  • Hébert D
  • Davies HD
  • Stephens D
  • O'Doherty B
  • et al.
Transplantation. 2006 Mar 27;81(6):856-61 doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000202724.07714.a2.
BACKGROUND:

Transplant recipients who are Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-seronegative and receive organs from seropositive donors (EBV D+/R-) are at increased risk for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) and may benefit from antiviral prophylaxis. We performed a multi-center trial assessing two different antiviral regimens and their effect on EBV replication.

METHODS:

EBV D+/R- solid organ transplant recipients were randomized to receive either ganciclovir and placebo or ganciclovir and immunoglobulin (IG) for 3 months. Following this, patients were unblinded and IG patients received additional IG therapy until 6 months. EBV viral loads were done at least monthly. RESULTS.: Thirty-four patients (25 pediatric, 9 adult) completed the protocol (16 placebo; 18 IG). The incidence of a detectable viral load within the first year posttransplant was 13/16 (81.3%) in the ganciclovir arm vs. 13/18 (72.2%) in the ganciclovir and IG arm (P=0.8). Time to first detectable viral load, and time to high-level viral load were not significantly different. By repeated measures ANOVA analysis, and by estimation of viral load AUC, no significant effect of randomization group was observed on EBV viral loads. PTLD developed in 3 (8.8%) patients (all in IG arm; P=0.23).

CONCLUSIONS:

No significant difference in EBV viral load suppression was observed when ganciclovir was compared with ganciclovir and IG in high-risk EBV D+/R- patients.

  • McLaughlin GE
  • Abitbol CL
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 Jul;20(7):1471-5 doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh785.
BACKGROUND:

Acute tacrolimus toxicity is manifest by oliguria and elevated serum creatinine. Various vasoregulatory molecules have been implicated in calcineurin inhibitor-mediated nephrotoxicity, including calcium, adenosine and endothelin. Theophylline (THEO), a non-specific adenosine-receptor antagonist prevents renal dysfunction from various nephrotoxins which mediate vasoconstriction. In the setting of acute tacrolimus toxicity, we demonstrated that administration of THEO along with a loop diuretic (LD) enhanced diuresis. This randomized, controlled trial was undertaken to confirm these earlier findings under more rigorous conditions.

METHODS:

Children with non-renal visceral transplant(s) and evidence of tacrolimus nephrotoxicity oliguria with a 25% increase in serum creatinine concentration from baseline, a whole blood tacrolimus concentration >20 ng/dl and oliguria resistant to therapy with a LD were randomized to receive either THEO (n = 10) or normal saline placebo (n = 8). Using pre and post (6 h) timed urine collections and coincident plasma concentrations the following were measured or calculated: urine flow rate, net fluid balance, creatinine clearance, fractional excretion of chloride, free water clearance and distal delivery of chloride.

RESULTS:

These patients had markedly impaired creatinine clearance at the onset of tacrolimus toxicity. Urine flow increased in the LD + THEO group by 110% over baseline, but was unchanged in the LD + NS group. An increase in creatinine clearance did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.09). Fractional excretion of chloride and distal solute delivery increased after THEO treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:

THEO induced a solute diuresis during furosemide-resistant oliguric tacrolimus toxicity in paediatric patients with a trend towards improved renal function.

  • Slota M
  • Green M
  • Farley A
  • Janosky J
  • Carcillo J
Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2):405-12 doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00034.
OBJECTIVE:

Nosocomial infection is an important contributor to morbidity and mortality in pediatric solid organ transplantation. The relative effect of protective gown and glove isolation was compared with strict handwashing in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients with solid organ transplantation.

DESIGN/SETTING:

A prospective, randomized design was used; children in a 23-bed PICU with solid organ transplantation were enrolled into a gown and glove protective isolation protocol or a strict handwashing protocol.

PATIENTS:

All children admitted to the PICU immediately after solid organ transplantation, excluding renal transplantation, and at subsequent readmissions to the PICU were eligible for the study. Children with current infection or known exposure to varicella were excluded from the study initially or at readmission.

INTERVENTIONS:

By using a block randomization design based on organ transplanted, age, and initial admission vs. readmission, each patient was randomized to either strict handwashing or protective gown and glove isolation intervention groups.

MEASUREMENTS:

We analyzed demographics, infection outcomes (defined according to Centers for Disease Control criteria), and monitoring of patient contacts in compliance with protocols.

RESULTS:

The infection rate in the overall PICU population did not change significantly from the year before the study compared with during the study (2.1 per 100 vs. 1.95 per 100 patient days; p =.4) The infection rate in the gown and glove group (2.3 per 100 patient days) was reduced significantly compared with the prestudy infection rate in the transplant population (4.9 per 100 patient days; p =.0008). Strict handwashing also significantly reduced the infection rate in the transplant population (3.0 per 100 patient days; p =.008). Compliance with gowning and gloving was 82% and compliance with handwashing was 76% (compared with 22% before study [p <.0001] and 52% after the study [p <.0001]). Despite an increased mean length of stay in the PICU in the gown and glove group (p =.014), there was a trend toward reduction in the incidence of infection (Fisher's exact test, p =.07; odds ratio,.76) in the gown and glove group.

CONCLUSIONS:

Increased compliance with handwashing was associated with a reduction in nosocomial infections, and gown and glove isolation appeared to have an additional protective effect. Some nosocomial infections may be preventable in the pediatric solid organ transplantation population.