In most centers, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is the preferred means to provide cardiopulmonary support during lung transplantation. However, there is controversy about whether intraoperative venoarterial (VA) ECMO should be used routinely or selectively. A randomized controlled trial is the best way to address this controversy. In this publication, we describe a feasibility study to assess the practicality of a protocol comparing routine versus selective VA-ECMO during lung transplantation. This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial screened all patients undergoing lung transplantation. Exclusion criteria include retransplantation, multiorgan transplantation, and cases where ECMO is mandatory. We determined that the trial would be feasible if we could recruit 19 participants over 6 months with less than 10% protocol violations. Based on the completed feasibility study, we conclude that the protocol is feasible and safe, giving us the impetus to pursue a multicenter trial with little risk of failure due to low recruitment.

BACKGROUND:

The immunogenicity of the standard influenza vaccine is reduced in solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients, so new vaccination strategies are needed in this population.

METHODS:

Adult SOT recipients from 9 transplant clinics in Switzerland and Spain were enrolled if they were >3 months after transplantation. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to a MF59-adjuvanted or a high-dose vaccine (intervention), or a standard vaccine (control), with stratification by organ and time from transplant. The primary outcome was vaccine response rate, defined as a ≥4-fold increase of hemagglutination-inhibition titers to at least 1 vaccine strain at 28 days postvaccination. Secondary outcomes included polymerase chain reaction-confirmed influenza and vaccine reactogenicity.

RESULTS:

A total of 619 patients were randomized, 616 received the assigned vaccines, and 598 had serum available for analysis of the primary endpoint (standard, n = 198; MF59-adjuvanted, n = 205; high-dose, n = 195 patients). Vaccine response rates were 42% (84/198) in the standard vaccine group, 60% (122/205) in the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine group, and 66% (129/195) in the high-dose vaccine group (difference in intervention vaccines vs standard vaccine, 0.20; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], .12-1); P < .001; difference in high-dose vs standard vaccine, 0.24 [95% CI, .16-1]; P < .001; difference in MF59-adjuvanted vs standard vaccine, 0.17 [97.5% CI, .08-1]; P < .001). Influenza occurred in 6% of the standard, 5% in the MF59-adjuvanted, and 7% in the high-dose vaccine groups. Vaccine-related adverse events occurred more frequently in the intervention vaccine groups, but most of the events were mild.

CONCLUSIONS:

In SOT recipients, use of an MF59-adjuvanted or a high-dose influenza vaccine was safe and resulted in a higher vaccine response rate.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION:

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03699839.

BACKGROUND:

Lung transplantation (LTx) is the only treatment option for end-stage lung disease. Despite improvements, primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains the leading cause of early mortality and precipitates chronic lung allograft dysfunction, the main factor in late mortality after LTx. PGD develops within the first 72 hours and impairs the oxygenation capacity of the lung, measured as partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2). Increasing the PaO2/FiO2 ratio is thus critical and has an impact on survival. There is a general lack of effective treatments for PGD. When a transplanted lung is not accepted by the immune system in the recipient, a systemic inflammatory response starts where cytokines play a critical role in initiating, amplifying, and maintaining the inflammation leading to PGD. Cytokine filtration can remove these cytokines from the circulation, thus reducing inflammation. In a proof-of-concept preclinical porcine model of LTx, cytokine filtration improved oxygenation and decreased PGD. In a feasibility study, we successfully treated patients undergoing LTx with cytokine filtration (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT05242289).

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the superiority of cytokine filtration in improving LTx outcome, based on its effects on oxygenation ratio, plasma levels of inflammatory markers, PGD incidence and severity, lung function, kidney function, survival, and quality of life compared with standard treatment with no cytokine filtration.

METHODS:

This study is a Swedish national interventional randomized controlled trial involving 116 patients. Its primary objective is to investigate the potential benefits of cytokine filtration when used in conjunction with LTx. Specifically, this study aims to determine whether the application of cytokine filtration, administered for a duration of 12 hours within the initial 24 hours following a LTx procedure, can lead to improved patient outcomes. This study seeks to assess various aspects of patient recovery and overall health to ascertain the potential positive impact of this intervention on the posttransplantation course.

RESULTS:

The process of patient recruitment for this study is scheduled to commence subsequent to a site initiation visit, which was slated to take place on August 28, 2023. The primary outcome measure that will be assessed in this research endeavor is the oxygenation ratio, a metric denoted as the highest PaO2/FiO2 ratio achieved by patients within a 72-hour timeframe following their LTx procedure.

CONCLUSIONS:

We propose that cytokine filtration could enhance the overall outcomes of LTx. Our hypothesis suggests potential improvements in LTx outcome and patient care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05526950; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05526950.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID):

PRR1-10.2196/52553.

IMPORTANCE:

The effectiveness of goal-directed care to reduce loss of brain-dead potential donors to cardiac arrest is unclear.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the effectiveness of an evidence-based, goal-directed checklist in the clinical management of brain-dead potential donors in the intensive care unit (ICU).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:

The Donation Network to Optimize Organ Recovery Study (DONORS) was an open-label, parallel-group cluster randomized clinical trial in Brazil. Enrollment and follow-up were conducted from June 20, 2017, to November 30, 2019. Hospital ICUs that reported 10 or more brain deaths in the previous 2 years were included. Consecutive brain-dead potential donors in the ICU aged 14 to 90 years with a condition consistent with brain death after the first clinical examination were enrolled. Participants were randomized to either the intervention group or the control group. The intention-to-treat data analysis was conducted from June 15 to August 30, 2020.

INTERVENTIONS:

Hospital staff in the intervention group were instructed to administer to brain-dead potential donors in the intervention group an evidence-based checklist with 13 clinical goals and 14 corresponding actions to guide care, every 6 hours, from study enrollment to organ retrieval. The control group provided or received usual care.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:

The primary outcome was loss of brain-dead potential donors to cardiac arrest at the individual level. A prespecified sensitivity analysis assessed the effect of adherence to the checklist in the intervention group.

RESULTS:

Among the 1771 brain-dead potential donors screened in 63 hospitals, 1535 were included. These patients included 673 males (59.2%) and had a median (IQR) age of 51 (36.3-62.0) years. The main cause of brain injury was stroke (877 [57.1%]), followed by trauma (485 [31.6%]). Of the 63 hospitals, 31 (49.2%) were assigned to the intervention group (743 [48.4%] brain-dead potential donors) and 32 (50.8%) to the control group (792 [51.6%] brain-dead potential donors). Seventy potential donors (9.4%) at intervention hospitals and 117 (14.8%) at control hospitals met the primary outcome (risk ratio [RR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.46-1.08; P = .11). The primary outcome rate was lower in those with adherence higher than 79.0% than in the control group (5.3% vs 14.8%; RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.78; P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:

This cluster randomized clinical trial was inconclusive in determining whether the overall use of an evidence-based, goal-directed checklist reduced brain-dead potential donor loss to cardiac arrest. The findings suggest that use of such a checklist has limited effectiveness without adherence to the actions recommended in this checklist.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03179020.

INTRODUCTION:

Telemedicine has been successfully employed in a wide range of conditions, such as such as chronic lung disease and COVID-19. This study evaluate the role of telemonitoring for the early diagnosis of acute lung allograft dysfunction in cystic fibrosis adults who underwent lung transplant (LuTx). Quality of life and functional level achieved during a 12 months follow up were assessed.

METHODS:

Patients were randomized into two groups; control group received traditional hospital-based follow-up, whereas patients in the intervention group received, on top of standard care, a telemonitoring device, with a pulse oximeter and a spirometer integrated. Telemonitoring data were digitally transmitted to our centre.

RESULTS:

Sixteen patients were enrolled in each group. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of incidence of allograft dysfunction, time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis and time of occurrence from LuTx. Moreover, both groups achieved similar quality of life and functional level. With reference to the telemonitoring group: 1) hospital reported data were consistent with those being remotely registered; 2) adherence to telemonitoring decreased during the follow up; 3) the majority of patients reported a high degree of satisfaction.

CONCLUSION:

The COVID19 pandemic highlighted the necessity to investigate alternative practices to treat chronically ill individuals. Telemonitoring is a valuable tool to improve quality care to LuTx recipients.

BACKGROUND:

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in lung transplant recipients is associated with high morbidity. This study evaluated the RSV fusion inhibitor presatovir in RSV-infected lung transplant recipients.

METHODS:

In this international Phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02534350), adult lung transplant recipients with symptomatic confirmed RSV infection for ≤7 days received oral presatovir 200 mg on day 1 and 100 mg daily on days 2 to 14, or placebo (2:1), with follow-up through day 28. There were 2 coprimary endpoints: time-weighted average change in nasal RSV load from day 1 to 7, calculated from nasal swabs, in the full analysis set ([FAS]; all patients who received study drug and had quantifiable baseline nasal RSV load) and time-weighted average change in nasal RSV load from day 1 to 7 in the subset of patients with pretreatment symptom duration at the median or shorter of the FAS. Secondary endpoints were changes in respiratory infection symptoms assessed using the Influenza Patient-Reported Outcomes questionnaire and lung function measured by spirometry.

RESULTS:

Sixty-one patients were randomized, 40 received presatovir, 20 placebo, and 54 were included in efficacy analyses. Presatovir did not significantly improve the primary endpoint in the FAS (treatment difference [95% CI], 0.10 [-0.43, 0.63] log10 copies/ml; p = 0.72) or the shorter symptom-duration subgroup (-0.12 [-0.94, 0.69] log10 copies/ml; p = 0.76). Secondary endpoints were not different between presatovir and placebo groups. Presatovir was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS:

Presatovir treatment did not significantly improve change in nasal RSV load, symptoms, or lung function in lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND:

The Hispanic community has a high demand for organ donation but a shortage of donors. Studies investigating factors that could promote or hinder organ donation have examined emotional video interventions. Factors acting as barriers to organ donation registration have been classified as: (1) Bodily integrity; (2) medical mistrust; (3) "ick"-feelings of disgust towards organ donation; and (4) "jinx"-fear that registration may result in one dying due to premeditated plans. We predict that by providing necessary information and education about the donation process via a short video, individuals will be more willing to register as organ donors.

AIM:

To determine perceptions and attitudes regarding barriers and facilitators to organ donation intention among Hispanic residents in the New York metro politan area.

METHODS:

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Northwell Health. The approval reference number is No. 19-0009 (as presented in Supplementary material). Eligible participants included Hispanic New York City (NYC) residents, 18 years of age and above, who were recruited voluntarily through Cloud Research and participated in a larger randomized survey study of NYC residents. The survey an 85-item Redcap survey measured participant demographics, attitudes, and knowledge of organ donation as well as the intention to register as an organ donor. Attention checks were implemented throughout the survey, and responses were excluded for those who did fail. Participants were randomly assigned two-between subject conditions: To view a short video on organ donation and then proceed to complete the survey (i.e., video first) and view the same video at the end of the survey (video last). No intra-group activities were conducted. This study utilized an evidenced-based emotive educational intervention (video) which was previously utilized and was shown to increase organ donation registration rates at the Ohio Department of Motor Vehicles. Results were analyzed using Jamovi statistical software. Three hundred sixty-five Hispanic individuals were included in the analysis. Once consent was obtained and participants entered the survey (the survey sample is presented in Supplementary material), participants were asked to report on demographic variables and their general impression of organ donation after death. The video depicted stories regarding organ donation after death from various viewpoints, including from the loved ones of a deceased person who died waiting for a transplant; from the loved ones of a deceased person whose organs were donated upon death; and, from those who were currently waiting for a transplant.

RESULTS:

Using a binomial logistic regression, the analysis provides information about the relationship between the effects of an emotive video and the intention to donate among Hispanic participants who were not already registered as donors. The willingness to go back and register was found to be significantly more probable for those who watched the emotive video before being asked about their organ donation opinions (odds ratio: 2.05, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-3.97). Motivations for participation in organ donation were also captured with many stating the importance of messages coming from "people like me" and a message that highlights "the welfare of those in need". Overall, the findings suggest that using an emotive video that addresses organ donation barriers to prompt organ donation intentions can be effective among the Hispanic populous. Future studies should explore using targeted messaging that resonates with specific cultural groups, highlighting the welfare of others.

CONCLUSION:

This study suggests that an emotive educational intervention is likely to be effective in improving organ donation registration intent among the Hispanic population residing in NYC.

Solid Organ Transplant (SOT) recipients are at significant higher risk for COVID-19 and due to immunosuppressive medication, the immunogenicity after vaccination is suboptimal. In the previous studies, booster method showed significant benefit in this population. In the current study, we compared using a mix-and-match method vs. same vaccine as a third dose in SOT recipients. This was a patient-blinded, single center, randomized controlled trial comparing BNT162b2 vs. JNJ-78436735 vaccine as the third dose after two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine. We included adult SOT recipients with functional graft who had received two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either BNT162b2 or JNJ-78436735 in one-to-one ratio. Primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 IgG positivity at 1 month after the third dose. Sixty SOT recipients, including 36 kidney, 12 liver, 2 lung, 3 heart, and 5 combined transplants, were enrolled, and 57 recipients were analyzed per protocol. There were no statistically significant differences between the two vaccine protocols for IgG positivity (83.3% vs. 85.2% for BNT162b2 and JNJ-78436735, respectively, p = 0.85, Odds Ratio 0.95, 95% Confidence Interval 0.23-4.00). Comparison of the geometric mean titer demonstrated a higher trend with BNT162b2 (p = 0.09). In this pilot randomized controlled trial comparing mix and match method vs. uniform vaccination in SOT recipients, both vaccines were safely used. Since this was a small sample sized study, there was no statistically significant difference in immunogenicity; though, the mix and match method showed relatively lower geometric mean titer, as compared to uniform vaccine. Further studies need to be conducted to determine duration of this immunogenicity. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05047640?term=20210641&draw=2&rank=1, identifier 20210641.

BACKGROUND:

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after lung transplantation (LuTx) contributes substantially to early postoperative morbidity. Both intraoperative transfusion of a large amount of blood products during the surgery and ischemia-reperfusion injury after allograft implantation play an important role in subsequent PGD development.

METHODS:

We have previously reported a randomized clinical trial of 67 patients where point of care (POC) targeted coagulopathy management and intraoperative administration of 5% albumin led to significant reduction of blood loss and blood product consumption during the lung transplantation surgery. A secondary analysis of the randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of targeted coagulopathy management and intraoperative administration of 5% albumin on early lung allograft function after LuTx and 1-year survival was performed.

RESULTS:

Compared to the patients in the control (non-POC) group, those in study (POC) group showed significantly superior graft function, represented by the Horowitz index (at 72 h after transplantation 402.87 vs 308.03 with p < 0.001, difference between means: 94.84, 95% CI: 60.18-129.51). Furthermore, the maximum doses of norepinephrine administered during first 24 h were significantly lower in the POC group (0.193 vs 0.379 with p < 0.001, difference between the means: 0.186, 95% CI: 0.105-0.267). After dichotomization of PGD (0-1 vs 2-3), significant difference between the non-POC and POC group occurred only at time point 72, when PGD grade 2-3 developed in 25% (n = 9) and 3.2% (n = 1), respectively (p = 0.003). The difference in 1-year survival was not statistically significant (10 patients died in non-POC group vs. 4 patients died in POC group; p = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS:

Utilization of a POC targeted coagulopathy management combined with Albumin 5% as primary resuscitative fluid may improve early lung allograft function, provide better circulatory stability during the early post-operative period, and have potential to decrease the incidence of PGD without negative effect on 1-year survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

This clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03598907).