51 results
Filters • 3
Sort By
Results Per Page
Filters
51 results
3
Download the following citations:
Email the following citations:
Print the following citations:
See all 1 Highlighted Expert Reviews articles matching your criteria
...
  • Patry C
  • Sauer LD
  • Sander A
  • Krupka K
  • Fichtner A
  • et al.
Pediatr Nephrol. 2023 May;38(5):1621-1632 doi: 10.1007/s00467-022-05777-x.
CET Conclusion
Reviewer: Mr Simon Knight, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford
Conclusion: This interesting study looked at the implications of substituting the control arm of a randomised controlled trial with a cohort derived from real-world registry data. The authors applied the same inclusion/exclusion criteria as used in the CRADLE RCT to the CERTAIN registry, and compared the demographics and outcomes seen in the two cohorts. Differences in demographics and outcomes were generally small and not statistically significant, leading the authors to conclude that the use of real-world data as a control in clinical trials is feasible. This is an interesting approach and may be particularly useful in fields where recruitment is challenging due to small numbers or rare conditions, or in situations where equipoise has been lost making randomisation unfeasible. There are drawbacks – the historical nature of controls may mean that subtle changes over time are missed, and the control cohort will only be as good and complete as the quality of the registry data collection. Outcomes will be limited to those reliably collected in the registry.
Aims: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of emulating the control arm of a randomised controlled trial in pediatric kidney transplantation (CRADLE trial) with Real‑World Data derived from the Cooperative European Paediatric Renal Transplant Initiative (CERTAIN) registry.
Interventions: Participants in the CRADLE trial were randomised to either continue standard tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids, or to switch to everolimus with reduced tacrolimus and steroid elimination from 5 months following transplantation.
Participants: 608 paediatric kidney transplant recipients (54 from the CRADLE control cohort and 554 from the CERTAIN cohort)
Outcomes: Patient death, graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), kidney transplant function, urinary protein-creatinine ratio, incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs), number of patients with any infection, urinary tract infections, anthropometric data and specifc laboratory endpoints of interest.
Follow Up: 12 months
BACKGROUND:

Randomized controlled trials in pediatric kidney transplantation are hampered by low incidence and prevalence of kidney failure in children. Real-World Data from patient registries could facilitate the conduct of clinical trials by substituting a control cohort. However, the emulation of a control cohort by registry data in pediatric kidney transplantation has not been investigated so far.

METHODS:

In this multicenter comparative analysis, we emulated the control cohort (n = 54) of an RCT in pediatric kidney transplant patients (CRADLE trial; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01544491) with data derived from the Cooperative European Paediatric Renal Transplant Initiative (CERTAIN) registry, using the same inclusion and exclusion criteria (CERTAIN cohort, n = 554).

RESULTS:

Most baseline patient and transplant characteristics were well comparable between both cohorts. At year 1 posttransplant, a composite efficacy failure end point comprising biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss or death (5.8% ± 3.3% vs. 7.5% ± 1.1%, P = 0.33), and kidney function (72.5 ± 24.9 vs. 77.3 ± 24.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 P = 0.19) did not differ significantly between CRADLE and CERTAIN. Furthermore, the incidence and severity of BPAR (5.6% vs. 7.8%), the degree of proteinuria (20.2 ± 13.9 vs. 30.6 ± 58.4 g/mol, P = 0.15), and the key safety parameters such as occurrence of urinary tract infections (24.1% vs. 15.5%, P = 0.10) were well comparable.

CONCLUSIONS:

In conclusion, usage of Real-World Data from patient registries such as CERTAIN to emulate the control cohort of an RCT is feasible and could facilitate the conduct of clinical trials in pediatric kidney transplantation. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

  • Guha C
  • Khalid R
  • van Zwieten A
  • Francis A
  • Hawley CM
  • et al.
Pediatr Nephrol. 2023 May;38(5):1577-1590 doi: 10.1007/s00467-022-05772-2.
BACKGROUND:

Children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) require multidisciplinary care to meet their complex healthcare needs. Patient navigators are trained non-medical personnel who assist patients and caregivers to overcome barriers to accessing health services through care coordination. This trial aims to determine the effectiveness of a patient navigator program in children with CKD.

METHODS:

The NAVKIDS2 trial is a multi-center, waitlisted, randomized controlled trial of patient navigators in children with CKD conducted at five sites across Australia. Children (0-16 years) with CKD from low socioeconomic status rural or remote areas were randomized to an intervention group or a waitlisted control group (to receive intervention after 6 months). The study primary and secondary endpoints include the self-rated health (SRH) (primary), and utility-based quality of life, progression of kidney dysfunction of the child, SRH, and satisfaction with healthcare of the caregiver at 6 months post-randomization.

RESULTS:

The trial completed recruitment in October 2021 with expected completion of follow-up by October 2022. There were 162 patients enrolled with 80 and 82 patients randomized to the immediate intervention and waitlisted groups, respectively. Fifty-eight (36%) participants were from regional/remote areas, with a median (IQR) age of 9.5 (5.0, 13.0) years, 46% were of European Australian ethnicity, and 65% were male. A total of 109 children (67%) had CKD stages 1-5, 42 (26%) were transplant recipients, and 11 (7%) were receiving dialysis.

CONCLUSION:

The NAVKIDS2 trial is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of patient navigation in children with CKD from families experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

  • Spence CM
  • Foshaug R
  • Rowland S
  • Krysler A
  • Conway J
  • et al.
CJC Pediatr Congenit Heart Dis. 2023 Apr 11;2(4):198-205 doi: 10.1016/j.cjcpc.2023.04.001.

Paediatric heart transplant recipients (HTRs) have reduced exercise capacity, physical activity (PA), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and self-efficacy towards PA. Exercise interventions have demonstrated improvements in exercise capacity and functional status in adult HTRs, with a specific emerging interest in the role of high-intensity interval training (HIIT). Studies of exercise interventions in paediatric HTRs have been limited and nonrandomized to date. HIIT has not yet been evaluated in paediatric HTRs. We thus seek to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a randomized crossover trial of a 12-week, home-based, video game-linked HIIT intervention using a cycle ergometer with telemedicine and remote physiological monitoring capabilities (MedBIKE) in paediatric HTRs. The secondary objective is to evaluate the impact of the intervention on (1) exercise capacity, (2) PA, (3) HRQoL and self-efficacy towards PA, and (4) sustained changes in secondary outcomes at 6 and 12 months after intervention. After a baseline assessment of the secondary outcomes, participants will be randomized to receive the MedBIKE intervention (12 weeks, 36 sessions) or usual care. After the intervention and a repeated assessment, all participants will cross over. Follow-up assessments will be administered at 6 and 12 months after the MedBIKE intervention. We anticipate that the MedBIKE intervention will be feasible and safely yield sustained improvements in exercise capacity, PA, HRQoL, and self-efficacy towards PA in paediatric HTRs. This study will serve as the foundation for a larger, multicentre randomized crossover trial and will help inform exercise rehabilitation programmes for paediatric HTRs.

  • Sayegh C
  • Im D
  • Moss IK
  • Urquiza R
  • Patel S
  • et al.
Pediatr Transplant. 2022 Nov;26(7):e14361 doi: 10.1111/petr.14361.
CET Conclusion
Reviewer: Mr John O'Callaghan, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford
Conclusion: This is an interesting study that paves the way for larger studies, with some adaptations. Young adult and adolescent liver transplant recipients were randomised to standard care, or to receive “praise text messages” when their immune suppression drug levels were in range. The study focussed on self-reported levels of confidence in taking medications, and self-reported adherence, which was already very high in the standard care group. There was also a high recognition of the importance of medication adherence. In multivariate analysis, participants in the intervention arm were significantly more likely to report taking their medications on time and as directed. The study was too small to see any endpoints in treatment outcome and there was no significant difference in measures of drug level variation. The intervention was cheap to install in terms of staff time and cost, it was also feasible and acceptable to patients. However, no difference in actual drug levels could be shown in this study, nor clinical outcomes and the self-reported confidence can certainly be confounded. With refinement of the protocol and personalisation of text messages, this could be taken forward to a larger study population.
Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility, acceptability and impact of a brief mobile health (mHealth) intervention on medication adherence among adolescent and young adult (AYA) liver transplant recipients.
Interventions: Participants were randomised to receive either praise text messages or to usual care.
Participants: 35 adolescent and young adult liver transplant recipients (13–21 years old).
Outcomes: Self-reported motivation and adherence, and medication level variability index (MLVI).
Follow Up: 1 year
BACKGROUND:

AYA who have undergone liver transplantations often struggle to adhere to their post-transplant immunosuppressant medications, which can lead to serious health complications. The objective of this pilot study is to examine the acceptability and feasibility of a brief mobile health (mHealth) intervention and its impact on medication adherence among AYA liver transplant recipients.

METHODS:

Thirty-five AYAs (13-21 years old) were randomized to either (1) receive praise text messages whenever laboratory results indicated immunosuppressant medications within the expected range or (2) usual care. Motivation for adherence and adherence were assessed via self-report, and a MLVI was calculated based on values abstracted from the electronic health record.

RESULTS:

Multilevel, multivariate models showed significant associations between group assignment and some self-reported motivation and adherence outcomes but not MLVI. Specifically, AYA receiving the praise text messages were significantly more likely to report taking their prescribed doses (OR = 2.49, p = .03), taking their medicine according to the directions (OR = 2.39, p = .04), and being highly confident in taking their medication (OR = 2.46, p = .04), compared with the usual services group. Qualitative responses indicated praise texts were mostly helpful but could be improved.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results suggest texting patients about positive health indicators was acceptable and, with refinement, might promote AYA illness self-management.

  • Rabus MB
  • Cekmecelioglu D
  • Ata P
  • Salihi S
  • Selcuk E
  • et al.
Exp Clin Transplant. 2022 Aug;20(8):762-767 doi: 10.6002/ect.2017.0230.
CET Conclusion
Reviewer: Mr Simon Knight, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, The Royal College of Surgeons of England.
Conclusion: This small single-centre study investigated the role of intraoperative ATG injected directly to the coronary sinus during cardiac transplantation. Patients in both groups also received postoperative ATG infusion, to achieve the same total dose in both groups. The authors claim a significant reduction in the risk of acute rejection in the intraoperative ATG group, as well as a reduction in echocardiographic abnormalities and need of inotropic therapy. Whilst on the face of it, this sounds like a promising intervention, there are significant deficiencies in the methodology and reporting of this study. This study is described as randomised, but from the description in the manuscript it appears to be a sequential cohort study with all intraoperative ATG patients recruited at the end of the study. No power calculation is presented, and there is a real risk of type I error in the acute rejection results. I was unable to replicate the claim of a statistically significant increase in acute rejection – with 2/15 control and 0/15 study patients experiencing rejection, a Fisher exact test gives a p-value of 0.48, rather than the <0.05 reported in the manuscript. The claims of reduced inotrope use and improved echocardiographic function are not backed up with any data. In short, the data presented in the manuscript do not support the conclusion of the authors.
Expert Review
Reviewer: Prof. Dr. Bart De Geest, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Conflicts of Interest: No
Clinical Impact Rating 1
Review: This prospective single center study was conducted in heart transplant patients receiving donor hearts procured after cardiocirculatory death (category III and category IV according to modified Maastricht classification). Thirty-two orthotopic heart transplant recipients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 included 17 patients who received retrograde antithymocyte globulin infusion via the coronary sinus intraoperatively and immediately after organ procurement and group 2 included 15 patients who received traditional antithymocyte globulin infusion after implantation. Two patients in group 1 were excluded due to early mortality resulting from a surgical complication (bleeding) and from acute renal failure. The first group had less acute rejection episodes than group 2 (0.0% vs 13.3%; P < .05) and graft function was better in these patients. The main limitation of this study is that group assignment was performed based on consecutive order, with group 1 being the last patients of the study period. The study is not a double-blind prospective study and no clear conclusions can be drawn. Furthermore, not all p-values are created equal and p-values obtained in small trials should be interpreted with greater caution.
Aims: To identify the effects of intraoperative antithymocyte globulin administration on donor hearts following cardiocirculatory death.
Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive retrograde antithymocyte globulin infusion via coronary sinus intraoperatively and immediately after organ procurement or traditional antithymocyte globulin infusion after implantation.
Participants: 30 patients with orthotropic heart transplants.
Outcomes: Allograft rejection and graft function.
Follow Up: 30 days.
OBJECTIVES:

Our study was conducted to determine the effects of intraoperative antithymocyte globulin administration on donor hearts procured after cardiocirculatory death. We evaluated the impact of antithymocyte globulin on graft function and related parameters during isothermic blood cardioplegia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

In this prospective and randomized single center study, 30 patients with orthotropic heart transplant were divided into 2 groups: group 1 included 15 patients who received retrograde antithymocyte globulin infusion via coronary sinus intraoperatively and immediately after organ procurement and group 2 included 15 patients who received traditional antithymocyte globulin infusion after implantation.

RESULTS:

Study patients had a mean age of 33.8 years (range, 15-56 y). All patients had panel reactive antibody less than 10% except for 3 patients. The cluster of differentiation 3-positive cell count decrease was more than 20%. The inotropic therapy dose required and the myocardial pressure (stiffness) were less for group 1 patients. These patients had less acute rejection episodes than group 2 (0% vs 13.3%; P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Favorable clinical outcomes were observed in terms of less acute rejection episodes and better graft function at least during the early posttransplant period. Intraoperative antithymocyte globulin treatment may have a preventive effect for acute cellular rejection in heart transplant patients.

  • Lerret SM
  • Flynn E
  • White-Traut R
  • Alonso E
  • Mavis AM
  • et al.
JMIR Nurs. 2022 Jul 15;5(1):e39263 doi: 10.2196/39263.
BACKGROUND:

Around 1800 pediatric transplantations were performed in 2021, which is approximately 5% of the annual rate of solid organ transplantations carried out in the United States. Effective family self-management in the transition from hospital to home-based recovery promotes successful outcomes of transplantation. The use of mHealth to deliver self-management interventions is a strategy that can be used to support family self-management for transplantation recipients and their families.

OBJECTIVE:

The study aims to evaluate the acceptability of an mHealth intervention (myFAMI) that combined use of a smartphone app with triggered nurse communication with family members of pediatric transplantation recipients.

METHODS:

This is a secondary analysis of qualitative data from family members who received the myFAMI intervention within a larger randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants used the app in the 30-day time frame after discharge and participated in a 30-day postdischarge telephone interview. Content analysis was used to generate themes.

RESULTS:

A total of 4 key themes were identified: (1) general acceptance, (2) positive interactions, (3) home management after hospital discharge, and (4) opportunities for improvement.

CONCLUSIONS:

Acceptability of the intervention was high. Family members rated the smartphone application as easy to use. myFAMI allowed the opportunity for families to feel connected to and engage with the medical team while in their home environment. Family members valued and appreciated ongoing support and education specifically in this first 30 days after their child's hospital discharge and many felt it contributed positively to the management of their child's medical needs at home. Family members provided recommendations for future refinement of the app and some suggested that a longer follow-up period would be beneficial. The development and refinement of mHealth care delivery strategies hold potential for improving outcomes for solid organ transplantation patients and their families and as a model to consider in other chronic illness populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03533049; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03533049.

  • Hayes W
  • Laing E
  • Foley C
  • Pankhurst L
  • Thomas H
  • et al.
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 14;12(3):e055595 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055595.
INTRODUCTION:

Acute electrolyte and acid-base imbalance is experienced by many children following kidney transplantation. When severe, this can lead to complications including seizures, cerebral oedema and death. Relatively large volumes of intravenous fluid are administered to children perioperatively in order to establish perfusion to the donor kidney, the majority of which are from living and deceased adult donors. Hypotonic intravenous fluid is commonly used in the post-transplant period due to clinicians' concerns about the sodium, chloride and potassium content of isotonic alternatives when administered in large volumes.Plasma-Lyte 148 is an isotonic, balanced intravenous fluid that contains sodium, chloride, potassium and magnesium with concentrations equivalent to those of plasma. There is a physiological basis to expect that Plasma-Lyte 148 will reduce the incidence of clinically significant electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities in children following kidney transplantation compared with current practice.The aim of the Plasma-Lyte Usage and Assessment of Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Children (PLUTO) trial was to determine whether the incidence of clinically significantly abnormal plasma electrolyte levels in paediatric kidney transplant recipients will be different with the use of Plasma-Lyte 148 compared with intravenous fluid currently administered.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS:

PLUTO is a pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial comparing Plasma-Lyte 148 to current care in paediatric kidney transplant recipients, conducted in nine UK paediatric kidney transplant centres.A total of 144 children receiving kidney transplants will be randomised to receive either Plasma-Lyte 148 (the intervention) intraoperatively and postoperatively, or current fluid. Apart from intravenous fluid composition, all participants will receive standard clinical transplant care.The primary outcome measure is acute hyponatraemia in the first 72 hours post-transplant, defined as laboratory plasma sodium concentration of <135 mmol/L. Secondary outcomes include symptoms of acute hyponatraemia, other electrolyte and acid-base imbalances and transplant kidney function.The primary outcome will be analysed using a logistic regression model adjusting for donor type (living vs deceased donor), patient weight (<20 kg vs ≥20 kg pretransplant) and transplant centre as a random effect.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:

The trial received Health Research Authority approval on 20 January 2020. Findings will be presented to academic groups via national and international conferences and peer-reviewed journals. The patient and public involvement group will play an important part in disseminating the study findings to the public domain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS:

2019-003025-22 and 16586164.

  • Sintusek P
  • Buranapraditkun S
  • Wanawongsawad P
  • Posuwan N
  • Thantiworasit P
  • et al.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jan 8;10(1) doi: 10.3390/vaccines10010092.
CET Conclusion
Reviewer: Dr Liset Pengel, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford
Conclusion: The randomised controlled trial evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a standard 3-dose (10 µg) versus a double 3-dose (20 µg) hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine in paediatric liver transplant recipients with immunologic loss who had previously received HepB immunisation. Sample size calculation showed that 68 participants needed to be recruited to allow for 10% dropouts. The trial enrolled 68 participants and 61 participants completed the study. The authors did not describe how the randomisation order was generated or whether allocation to groups was concealed. Humoral response was not significantly different between groups at any time point over 12 months. Cellular response was assessed in 42 participants and showed no statistically significant differences between groups. Safety outcomes were also similar between groups. Participants were categorised as hyporesponders, responders or nonresponders and their baseline characteristics were compared to identify factors associated with immunologic response to vaccination. Early revaccination, lower anti-HBs levels at baseline, and higher tacrolimus trough levels were associated with no seroprotective antibody levels after vaccination.
Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and immunogenicity of standard three-dose versus double three-dose hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine regimens in paediatric patients following liver transplantation.
Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to receive either a standard 3-dose or double 3-dose HepB vaccine.
Participants: Paediatric liver transplant recipients (aged 1-18 years).
Outcomes: Safety outcomes included incidence of adverse events. Immunogenicity outcomes included assessment of humoral response and cellular response.
Follow Up: 12 months

A high prevalence of hepatitis B (HepB) antibody loss after liver transplantation (LT) and de novo HepB infection (DNH) was documented, hence revaccination to prevent DNH is crucial. This study aimed to compare the safety and immunogenicity of two HepB vaccine regimens in liver-transplanted children. Liver-transplanted children who were previously immunised but showed HepB surface antibodies (anti-HBs) ≤ 100 mIU/mL were randomised to receive a standard three-dose (SD) and double three-dose (DD) vaccine intramuscularly in months 0-1-6. Anti-HBs and T-cell-specific response to the HepB antigen were assessed. A total of 61 children (54.1% male, aged 1.32 ± 1.02 years) completed the study without any serious adverse reaction. The seroprotective rate was 69.6% vs. 60% (p = 0.368) and 91.3% vs. 85% (p = 0.431) in SD and DD after the first and third 3-dose vaccinations, respectively. The geometric mean titre (95% confidence interval) of anti-HBs in SD and DD were 443.33 (200.75-979.07) vs. 446.17 (155.58-1279.50) mIU/mL, respectively, at completion. Numbers of interferon-γ-secreting cells were higher in hyporesponders/responders than in nonresponders (p = 0.003). The significant factors for the immunologic response to HepB vaccination were anti-HB levels prevaccination, tacrolimus trough levels, and time from LT to revaccination. SD and DD had comparative immunogenicity and were safe for liver-transplanted children who were previously immunised.

  • Sweet SC
  • Armstrong B
  • Blatter J
  • Chin H
  • Conrad C
  • et al.
Am J Transplant. 2022 Jan;22(1):230-244 doi: 10.1111/ajt.16862.
CET Conclusion
Reviewer: Mr John O'Callaghan, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford
Conclusion: This is a good quality randomised controlled trial in paediatric lung transplantation. The study was double-blinded and conducted in multiple centres. Patients were randomised to either standard immune induction with ATG (plus placebo) or to ATG and Rituximab. The primary outcome was composite graft dysfunction, death or re-listing. Unfortunately, only 11 subjects met criteria for the composite primary outcome, so the study was underpowered to demonstrate all but the most drastic of differences between the study arms. Whilst there was no significant difference in the primary outcome, there was a significantly lower generation of de novo DSA in the Rituximab arm (21% versus 73%). There was no significant difference in adverse event rates. A much larger study, and with longer follow up, is required.
Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate whether rituximab in addition to rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction was effective in reducing the development of de novo donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA) and improve outcomes, in paediatric lung transplant recipients.
Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to either the rituximab group or the placebo group
Participants: 27 paediatric lung transplant patients.
Outcomes: The primary outcome was a composite of chronic allograft dysfunction, listing for re-transplant or death. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of primary graft dysfunction, antibody-mediated rejection and acute cellular rejection.
Follow Up: 24 months

We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of pediatric lung transplant recipients, hypothesizing that rituximab plus rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction would reduce de novo donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA) development and improve outcomes. We serially obtained clinical data, blood, and respiratory samples for at least one year posttransplant. We analyzed peripheral blood lymphocytes by flow cytometry, serum for antibody development, and respiratory samples for viral infections using multiplex PCR. Of 45 subjects enrolled, 34 were transplanted and 27 randomized to rituximab (n = 15) or placebo (n = 12). No rituximab-treated subjects versus five placebo-treated subjects developed de novo DSA with mean fluorescence intensity >2000. There was no difference between treatment groups in time to the primary composite outcome endpoint (death, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome [BOS] grade 0-p, obliterative bronchiolitis or listing for retransplant). A post-hoc analysis substituting more stringent chronic lung allograft dysfunction criteria for BOS 0-p showed no difference in outcome (p = .118). The incidence of adverse events including infection and rejection episodes was no different between treatment groups. Although the study was underpowered, we conclude that rituximab induction may have prevented early DSA development in pediatric lung transplant recipients without adverse effects and may improve outcomes (Clinical Trials: NCT02266888).

  • Lloyd C
  • Arshad A
  • Jara P
  • Burdelski M
  • Gridelli B
  • et al.
Transplant Direct. 2021 Sep 20;7(10):e765 doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001221.
CET Conclusion
Reviewer: Mr Simon Knight, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford
Conclusion: This manuscript reports long-term outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine microemulsion in paediatric liver transplantation. The original study recruited 156 recipients between 1997 and 2000. 81% patients randomized to tacrolimus remained on protocol treatment at study end, compared to just 31% of patients on CsA. Due to the large number of crossovers, the authors sensibly present narrative data. There were numerically fewer deaths from chronic rejection/liver failure, and less cosmetic side effects with tacrolimus. Clearly, the strength of conclusions are limited by the large crossover which precluded statistical analysis. Nonetheless, it appears that CsA is poorly tolerated in this population, supporting the adoption of tacrolimus as first-line immunosuppression seen in most centres.
Aims: The aim of this study was to report the long-term outcomes of a randomised controlled trial comparing tacrolimus (Tac) and cyclosporine immunosuppression in paediatric liver transplant recipients.
Interventions: Patients in the original trial were randomised to either a dual Tac regimen (tacrolimus and corticosteroids) or to cyclosporine A microemulsion (CyA-ME) therapy (CyA-ME, corticosteroids and azathioprine).
Participants: 156 paediatric liver transplant recipients.
Outcomes: The outcomes of interest included time to first rejection episode (acute or chronic), renal function, graft survival, patient survival, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) incidence, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, and adverse events.
Follow Up: 14 years
UNLABELLED:

The aim of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (Tac) and cyclosporine immunosuppression in pediatric liver transplantation (LTx).

METHODS:

One hundred fifty-six patients who had taken part in a multicenter, randomized, open, parallel study of Tac and corticosteroids versus cyclosporine A microemulsion (CyA-ME), corticosteroids, and azathioprine. Patients were assessed at regular intervals up to 14 y after LTx. Analysis was conducted descriptively.

RESULTS:

In a long-term follow-up, there was a similar incidence of acute rejection (Tac versus CyA-ME, 5 versus 8) and graft loss (5 versus 10). There were 11 deaths in the cohort, which were from infectious complications/malignancy in the Tac group (n = 2/5) and from chronic rejection/liver failure in the CyA-ME group (n = 3/6). A similar incidence of Epstein-Barr virus and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease was observed (8 versus 8, 3 versus 3). However, there was a greater incidence of cosmetic adverse events in the CyA-ME cohort, with higher incidences of hypertrichosis (8 versus 27) and gum hyperplasia (20 versus 6). Growth improved equally in both groups. Overall, 81% of patients randomized to Tac remained on Tac therapy at study end, compared with 31% of patients randomized to CyA-ME. Common reasons for switching from CyA-ME included steroid-resistant/acute rejection (n = 12/8) and cosmetic changes (n = 8).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study is the first prospective, observational follow-up study of pediatric patients randomized to Tac and CyA-ME to evaluate long-term outcomes. Our analysis was limited by the degree of switchover between the cohorts; however, there were fewer deaths from chronic rejection/liver failure and reduced adverse events with Tac. Long-term use of Tac and Tac combination therapy appears to be safe and effective immunosuppression for pediatric LTx recipients.