1,108 results
Filters • 1
Sort By
Results Per Page
Filters
1,108 results
1
Download the following citations:
Email the following citations:
Print the following citations:
See all 24 Highlighted Expert Reviews articles matching your criteria
...
  • Dong C
  • Song Z
  • Sun C
  • Wang K
  • Zhang W
  • et al.
BACKGROUND:

Optimizing the immunosuppressive regimen is essential to improve the long-term outcomes of pediatric liver transplant recipients.

METHODS:

We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label study to compare the safety and efficacy of 2 treatment approaches during pediatric liver transplantation: tacrolimus monotherapy following basiliximab induction (the study group) and a dual regimen of tacrolimus plus steroids (the control group). A total of 150 patients were enrolled, with 75 patients allocated to each group.

RESULTS:

In both groups, recipients achieved graft and recipient overall survival rates exceeding 93%, with no statistically significant differences between them. However, the study group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR), delayed occurrence of ACR, and an improved ACR-free survival rate at 2 y compared with the control group. Notably, the study group also showed a significant reduction in the incidence of de novo donor-specific antibodies at 3-mo and 2-y posttransplant. Furthermore, 6 mo after the transplant, the study group demonstrated significant improvements in weight-for-age Z score and height-for-age Z score. No notable differences were observed in postoperative complications or the incidence of liver fibrosis between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Basiliximab induction combine with tacrolimus (TAC) monotherapy is a safe and effective immunosuppressive regimen to reduce the episodes of ACR without influencing the development of liver fibrosis and graft and recipient survival rate after pediatric liver transplantation.

  • Sharif A
  • Chakkera H
  • de Vries APJ
  • Eller K
  • Guthoff M
  • et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024 Feb 28;39(3):531-549 doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfad258.

Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) remains a leading complication after solid organ transplantation. Previous international PTDM consensus meetings in 2003 and 2013 provided standardized frameworks to reduce heterogeneity in diagnosis, risk stratification and management. However, the last decade has seen significant advancements in our PTDM knowledge complemented by rapidly changing treatment algorithms for management of diabetes in the general population. In view of these developments, and to ensure reduced variation in clinical practice, a 3rd international PTDM Consensus Meeting was planned and held from 6-8 May 2022 in Vienna, Austria involving global delegates with PTDM expertise to update the previous reports. This update includes opinion statements concerning optimal diagnostic tools, recognition of prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance), new mechanistic insights, immunosuppression modification, evidence-based strategies to prevent PTDM, treatment hierarchy for incorporating novel glucose-lowering agents and suggestions for the future direction of PTDM research to address unmet needs. Due to the paucity of good quality evidence, consensus meeting participants agreed that making GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) recommendations would be flawed. Although kidney-allograft centric, we suggest that these opinion statements can be appraised by the transplantation community for implementation across different solid organ transplant cohorts. Acknowledging the paucity of published literature, this report reflects consensus expert opinion. Attaining evidence is desirable to ensure establishment of optimized care for any solid organ transplant recipient at risk of, or who develops, PTDM as we strive to improve long-term outcomes.

  • Venkatakrishnan G
  • Kathirvel M
  • Sivasankara Pillai Thankamony Amma B
  • Muraleedharan AK
  • Mathew JS
  • et al.
HPB (Oxford). 2024 Feb;26(2):171-178 doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.10.017.
BACKGROUND:

To compare the safety and efficacy of once-daily tacrolimus (ODT) versus twice-daily tacrolimus (BDT) in adult live donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS:

In this open-labelled randomized trial, 174 adult patients undergoing LDLT were randomized into ODT or BDT, combined with basiliximab induction and mycophenolate mofetil (steroid-free regimen). Tacrolimus was started at a total dose of 1 mg and the trough level was aimed at 3-7 ng/ml. The primary endpoint was eGFR at 1,3- and 6 months post-transplant, using CKD- EPI equation. Secondary endpoints included biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), metabolic complications, post-operative bilio-vascular complications and patient survival.

RESULTS:

There was no statistically significant difference in eGFR between the two groups at 6 months (ODT -96 ± 19, BDT -91 ± 21, p value-0.164). BPAR was comparable (18/84 in ODT, 19/88 in BDT, p value-0.981). For a similar dosage of tacrolimus, the median trough tacrolimus levels attained were significantly lower for ODT than BDT during the first-month post-transplant (p value-0.001). Metabolic complications due to immunosuppression, post-operative bilio-vascular complications and patient survival was similar between the two groups at 6 months.

CONCLUSION:

Once-daily tacrolimus has similar renal safety and efficacy as twice-daily tacrolimus when used in combination with basiliximab induction and mycophenolate in adult LDLT.

  • Passerini M
  • Nayfeh T
  • Yetmar ZA
  • Coussement J
  • Goodlet KJ
  • et al.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024 Feb;30(2):170-177 doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.10.008.
BACKGROUND:

Whether trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) prophylaxis prevents nocardiosis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is controversial.

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the effect of TMP-SMX in the prevention of nocardiosis after SOT, its dose-response relationship, its effect on preventing disseminated nocardiosis, and the risk of TMP-SMX resistance in case of breakthrough infection.

METHODS:

A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES:

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus up to 19 September 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:

(a) Risk of nocardiosis between SOT recipients with and without TMP-SMX prophylaxis, or (b) sufficient details to determine the rate of TMP-SMX resistance in breakthrough nocardiosis.

PARTICIPANTS:

SOT recipients.

INTERVENTION:

TMP-SMX prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS:

Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Exposure (ROBINS-E) for comparative studies; dedicated tool for non-comparative studies.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS:

For our primary outcome (i.e. to determine the effect of TMP-SMX on the risk of nocardiosis), a one-step mixed-effects regression model was used to estimate the association between the outcome and the exposure. Univariate and multivariable unconditional regression models were used to adjust for the potential confounding effects. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS:

Individual data from three case-control studies were obtained (260 SOT recipients with nocardiosis and 519 uninfected controls). TMP-SMX prophylaxis was independently associated with a significantly decreased risk of nocardiosis (adjusted OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.18-0.52, moderate certainty of evidence). Variables independently associated with an increased risk of nocardiosis were older age, current use of corticosteroids, high calcineurin inhibitor concentration, recent acute rejection, lower lymphocyte count, and heart transplant. Breakthrough infections (66/260, 25%) were generally susceptible to TMP-SMX (pooled proportion 98%, 95% CI 92-100).

CONCLUSIONS:

In SOT recipients, TMP-SMX prophylaxis likely reduces the risk of nocardiosis. Resistance appears uncommon in case of breakthrough infection.

  • Khamlek K
  • Komenkul V
  • Sriboonruang T
  • Wattanavijitkul T
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Feb;90(2):406-426 doi: 10.1111/bcp.15909.
AIMS:

This study aimed to provide up-to-date information on paediatric population pharmacokinetic models of tacrolimus and to identify factors influencing tacrolimus pharmacokinetic variability.

METHODS:

Systematic searches in the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane, EMBASE databases and reference lists of articles were conducted from inception to March 2023. All population pharmacokinetic studies of tacrolimus using nonlinear mixed-effect modelling in paediatric solid organ transplant patients were included.

RESULTS:

Of the 21 studies reviewed, 62% developed from liver transplant recipients and 33% from kidney transplant recipients. Most studies used a 1-compartment model to describe tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. Body weight was a significant predictor for tacrolimus volume of distribution (Vd/F). The estimated Vd/F for 1-compartment models ranged from 20 to 1890 L, whereas the peripheral volume of distribution (Vp/F) for 2-compartment models was between 290 and 1520 L. Body weight, days post-transplant, CYP3A5 genotype or haematocrit were frequently reported as significant predictors of tacrolimus clearance. The estimated apparent clearance values range between 0.12 and 2.18 L/h/kg, with inter-individual variability from 13.5 to 110.0%. Only 29% of the studies assessed the generalizability of the models with external validation.

CONCLUSION:

This review highlights the potential factors, modelling approaches and validation methods that impact tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in a paediatric population. The clinician could predict tacrolimus clearance based on body weight, CYP3A5 genotype, days post-transplant or haematocrit. Further research is required to determine the relationship between pharmacogenetics and tacrolimus pharmacodynamics in paediatric patients and confirm the applicability of nonlinear kinetics in this population.

  • Bulbuloglu S
  • Gunes H
Explore (NY). 2024 Jan 17; doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2024.01.005.
OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on the adherence of liver transplant recipients to immunosuppressive therapy with a randomized controlled design.

METHOD:

This randomized controlled trial was performed with 120 liver transplant recipients hospitalized at the liver transplant department of a research and practice hospital (n = 120). While we administered no intervention to the patients in the control group (n = 60), we provided Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy to those in the experimental group (n = 60). We used the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale and the Immunosuppressant Therapy Adherence Scale to collect data. We utilized descriptive statistics, paired-samples t-tests, independent-samples t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, and chi-squared tests to analyze the data.

RESULTS:

After the intervention, the immunosuppressive therapy adherence levels of the experimental group increased significantly (p < 0.01). On the other hand, the control group had significantly higher adherence to immunosuppressive therapy and significantly higher levels of mindfulness in the pretest phase than it did in the posttest phase (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

Complete adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is imperative for the prevention of graft rejection in liver transplant recipients. In our study, the experimental group equipped with enhanced mindfulness had higher adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Therefore, the use of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in the promotion of adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is recommended.

  • Sintusek P
  • Buranapraditkun S
  • Khunsri S
  • Polsawat W
  • Vichaiwattana P
  • et al.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 4;14(1):499 doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51149-w.

Rapid hepatitis B (HB) surface antibody (anti-HBs) loss is prevalent after liver transplantation (LT). Herein, we evaluated anti-HBs persistence after HB vaccination using two regimens in LT children. We recruited 66 previously immunized LT children with anti-HBs level of < 100 mIU/mL. Participants were randomly reimmunized with standard-three-dose (SD) and double-three-dose (DD) intramuscular HB vaccination at 0, 1, and 6 months. Anti-HBs were assessed at every outpatient visit. Antibody loss defined as anti-HBs levels < 100 mIU/mL after three-dose vaccination. After three-dose vaccination, 81.8% and 78.7% of participants in the SD and DD groups, had anti-HBs levels > 100 mIU/mL, with a geometric mean titer (GMT) of 601.68 and 668.01 mIU/mL (P = 0.983). After a mean follow-up of 2.31 years, the anti-HBs GMT was 209.81 and 212.61 mIU/mL in the SD and DD groups (P = 0.969). The number of immunosuppressants used and an anti-HBs level < 1 mIU/mL at baseline were independently associated with anti-HB loss. The DD regimen strongly increased the risk of anti-HBs loss (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.97 [1.21-7.31]; P = 0.018). The SD HB reimmunization regimen effectively maintained protective anti-HBs levels in children undergoing LT, making it the preferred regimen for such children with anti-HB loss.Trial registration: TCTR20180723002.

  • Helmick RA
  • Eymard CM
  • Naik S
  • Eason JD
  • Nezakatgoo N
  • et al.
Clin Transplant. 2024 Jan;38(1):e15172 doi: 10.1111/ctr.15172.
CET Conclusion
Reviewer: Mr Simon Knight, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford
Conclusion: This single centre study randomised 110 liver transplant recipients to receive standard release or extended-release tacrolimus in conjunction with rabbit ATG following liver transplantation. Renal function did not differ between groups at any point post-transplant. There were also no statistically significant differences in quality of life, rejection rates or adverse event rates between groups. Overall, the study appears well-conducted and reported. It demonstrates that extended-release tacrolimus provides an alternative to standard release tacrolimus in this patient population, although does not provide any evidence of measurable clinical benefit within the first year.
Aims: This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of extended-release tacrolimus (XRT) in comparison to immediate release tacrolimus (IRT) following liver transplantation in a steroid-free protocol with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (RATG).
Interventions: Participants were randomised to either the XRT group or the IRT group.
Participants: 110 liver transplant recipients.
Outcomes: The main outcomes were the assessment of creatinine and eGFR, adverse events, rejection and quality of life.
Follow Up: 12 months
PURPOSE:

Our study hypothesis was that once daily dosing of extended-release tacrolimus (XRT) would be a safe and effective immunosuppression (IS) with the potential to decrease adverse events (AEs) associated with immediate release tacrolimus (IRT) after liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS:

All patients receiving LT at our center received rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (RATG) induction therapy. Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either XRT or IRT. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was the same between arms, and both groups received an antimetabolite for the first 6 months following LT. Patients were then followed at pre-determined study intervals for the following year after LT. We administered the RAND-36SF survey to assess patient's health-related quality of life at pre-determined intervals. All analysis was performed with an intention to treat basis.

RESULTS:

We screened 194 consecutive patients and enrolled 110. Our control and study arms were well matched. Transplant characteristics were similar between groups. At all timepoints, both arms had similar serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), calculated by MDRD6 equation, with post-transplant GFRs between 60 and 70 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Tacrolimus trough levels were similar between arms. The XRT arm had fewer AEs (166) and fewer serious AEs (70) compared to IRT (201 and 99, respectively). AEs most commonly were renal, infectious, or gastrointestinal in nature. While not statistically significant, XRT was held temporarily (25 vs. 35 cases) or discontinued (3 vs. 11 cases) less frequently than IRT and had fewer instances of rejection (7 vs. 12 cases).

CONCLUSION:

This analysis showed that XRT is safe and effective as de novo maintenance IS in a steroid-free protocol with RATG.

  • Appenzeller-Herzog C
  • Rosat A
  • Mathes T
  • Baroja-Mazo A
  • Chruscinski A
  • et al.
Liver Int. 2024 Jan;44(1):250-262 doi: 10.1111/liv.15764.
BACKGROUND & AIMS:

Successful immunosuppression withdrawal (ISW) is possible for a subfraction of liver transplant (LT) recipients but the factors that define the risk of ISW failure are largely unknown. One candidate prognostic factor for ISW success or operational tolerance (OT) is longer time between LT and ISW which we term "pre-withdrawal time". To clarify the impact of pre-withdrawal time span on subsequent ISW success or failure, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis.

METHODS:

We systematically interrogated the literature for LT recipient ISW studies reporting pre-withdrawal time. Eligible articles from Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were used for backward and forward citation searching. Pre-withdrawal time individual patient data (IPD) was requested from authors. Pooled mean differences and time-response curves were calculated using random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS:

We included 17 studies with 691 patients, 15 of which (620 patients) with IPD. Study-level risk of bias was heterogeneous. Mean pre-withdrawal time was greater by 427 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 67-788] in OT compared to non-OT patients. This increase was potentiated to 799 days (95% CI 369-1229) or 1074 days (95% CI 685-1463) when restricting analysis to adult or European study participants. In time-response meta-analysis for adult or European ISW candidates, likelihood of OT increased by 7% (95% CI 4-10%) per year after LT (GRADE low- and moderate-certainty of evidence, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our data support the impact of pre-withdrawal time in ISW decision-making for adult and European LT recipients.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION:

CRD42021272995.

  • Yamshon S
  • Gribbin C
  • Chen Z
  • Demetres M
  • Pasciolla M
  • et al.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Jan;30(1):73.e1-73.e12 doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.05.018.

The safety and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is poorly understood, given the paucity of available data in this patient population. There is a theoretical risk of compromising transplanted organ function with CAR T cell therapy; conversely, organ transplantation-related immunosuppression can alter the function of CAR T cells. Given the prevalence of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease, which often can be difficult to treat with conventional chemoimmunotherapy, understanding the risks and benefits of delivering lymphoma-directed CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is of utmost importance. We sought to determine the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients as well as the associated adverse effects, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and compromised solid organ transplant function. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of adult recipients of solid organ transplant who received CAR T cell therapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Primary outcomes included efficacy, defined as overall response (OR), complete response (CR), progression-free survival, and overall survival, as well as rates of CRS and ICANS. Secondary outcomes included rates of transplanted organ loss, compromised organ function, and alterations to immunosuppressant regimens. After a systematic literature review and 2-reviewer screening process, we identified 10 studies suitable for descriptive analysis and 4 studies suitable for meta-analysis. Among all patients, 69% (24 of 35) achieved a response to CAR T cell therapy, and 52% (18 of 35) achieved a CR. CRS of any grade occurred in 83% (29 of 35), and CRS grade ≥3 occurred in 9% (3 of 35). Sixty percent of the patients (21 of 35) developed ICANS, and 34% (12 of 35) developed ICANS grade ≥3. The incidence of any grade 5 toxicity among all patients was 11% (4 of 35). Fourteen percent of the patients (5 of 35) experienced loss of the transplanted organ. Immunosuppressant therapy was held in 22 patients but eventually restarted in 68% of them (15 of 22). Among the studies included in the meta-analysis, the pooled OR rate was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.2% to 100%; I2 = 71%) and the pooled CR rate was 46% (95% CI, 25.4% to 67.8%; I2 = 29%). The rates of any grade CRS and grade ≥3 CRS were 88% (95% CI, 69% to 99%; I2 = 0%) and 5% (95% CI, 0% to 21%; I2 = 0%), respectively. The rates of any grade ICANS and ICANS grade ≥3 were 54% (95% CI, 9% to 96%; I2 = 68%) and 40% (95% CI, 3% to 85%; I2 = 63%), respectively. The efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is comparable to that in the general population as reported in prior investigational studies, with an acceptable toxicity profile in terms of CRS, ICANS, and transplanted organ compromise. Further studies are needed to determine long-term effects on organ function, sustained response rates, and best practices peri-CAR T infusion period in this patient population.