BACKGROUND:

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with cystic fibrosis (CF) may benefit from the pulmonary and extrapulmonary benefits associated with CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulators. Nevertheless, evolution of modulator safety and efficacy data prompts consideration.

METHODS:

The search terms "transplant" AND "ivacaftor"(IVA) OR "lumacaftor"(LUM) OR "tezacaftor" (TEZ) OR "elexacaftor" (ELX) were utilized to conduct a scoping review of English articles from the period of January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2022. Search results from PubMed and Embase databases were reviewed by title and abstract for relevance. Included studies reported efficacy and safety outcomes of modulators in SOT recipients.

RESULTS:

One hundred thirty-six patients from one cohort study (90 lung transplant recipients) and eight case reports and series (29 lung transplant recipients, 16 liver transplant recipients and one lung/liver transplant patient) were included. Post-modulator initiation, 33 patients did not necessitate tacrolimus dose adjustments, 10 required dose uptitration, and 43 required dose reductions. Moreover, LUM/IVA use with azole antifungals may lead to subtherapeutic levels but opposing effects sustained tacrolimus levels. Liver transplant recipients were more likely to experience elevations in transaminases requiring pharmacologic or medical interventions. Majority of patients experienced improvements in pulmonary function, fasting blood glucose, hemoglobin, body mass index, and rhinosinusitis symptoms. However, intolerance or lack of benefit prompted discontinuation of ELX/TEZ/IVA in over 40% of lung-transplant recipients in one study.

CONCLUSION:

Modulator therapy has been reported to produce pulmonary and extra-pulmonary benefits in the CF population with SOT. Considerations for modulator therapy initiation ought to include modulator pharmacokinetics, concomitant medications, and transplant type due to the complex nature of SOT recipients.

Liver cirrhosis, which is considered one of the leading causes of death in the world, can lead to severe complications, and is often followed by a liver transplantation. These patients take an average of nine medications daily. If not managed adequately, it can be accompanied by serious drug-related problems. To reduce this risk, a clinical pharmacist may be included as part of the healthcare team to optimize medication therapy in this population. This study aimed to systematically identify the pharmaceutical interventions which reduced drug-related problems and improved medication therapy for adult hospitalized liver cirrhotic and liver transplant patients when compared to standard care. Three databases (PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL) were systematically searched from the inception of each database to 25 October 2023, and interventional studies in the English language were included. The risk of bias was assessed according to RoB-I for the UBA study and RoB2 for the identified RCT. The detected interventions to reduce drug-related problems in liver cirrhotic and liver transplant patients were extracted and classified according to a "Hierarchy of Controls" model. Two studies from Germany and the USA met our inclusion criteria, respectively. In these studies, we identified two interventions that included education, expert consultation, and the monitoring of the immunosuppressive medications serum level. The main objective of the two included studies was improving patients' compliance through adherence. These pharmaceutical interventions identified were classified as administrative controls, which is one of the lowest levels in the "Hierarchy of Controls" with which to address a potential risk. Pharmaceutical interventions to optimize medication therapy were found to be rare in the examined population, and were limited to "administrative controls". These interventions were limited to transplant patients' education and the monitoring of the immunosuppressive medication serum levels. No interventional studies were found to have investigated pharmaceutical interventions in patients with liver cirrhosis. Especially regarding this patient group, future studies to reduce DRPs using pharmaceutical interventions are needed. This study received no external funding and its PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022309122.

PURPOSE:

We aimed to investigate the association between ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily B Member 1 (ABCB1) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus.

METHODS:

A search was conducted in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science (SCI), MEDLINE, and Embase from inception to November 2022. Outcomes included weightadjusted daily dose (DD) and dose-adjusted trough concentration (C0/Dose).

RESULTS:

A total of 1059 liver or kidney transplant recipients from 14 publications were included. For adult liver transplantation recipients, DD of ABCB1 3435C>T CC carriers was 0.03 mg/kg/day (WMD = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.05, I2 = 0%) higher than ABCB1 3435C>T T carriers at post-transplantation ≤ 7 days; C0/dose of ABCB1 3435C>T CC carriers were 31.88 (WMD = -31.88, 95% CI: -62.32 to -1.45, I2 = 83.5%) or 34.61 (ng/ml)/(mg/kg/day) (WMD = -34.61, 95% CI: -65.26 to -3.97, I2 = 55.3%) lower than ABCB1 3435C>T T carriers at post-transplantation ≤ 7 or 14 days, respectively. No difference in C0/dose was observed for ABCB1 2677G>T/A or ABCB1 1236C>T SNPs in both liver and kidney transplant recipients.

CONCLUSION:

ABCB1 3435C>T SNP might have a potential impact on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in the early stage after liver transplantation, indicating the probability of individualized immunosuppressive therapy based on genetic polymorphism. Given some limitations, further well-designed prospective studies are warranted to validate these conclusions.

BACKGROUND:

Although generic ciclosporin-A (CsA) and tacrolimus (TAC) have been used for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in transplant patients for decades, evidence in their safety profile compared to reference listed drugs (RLDs) in real-world transplant patients remains limited.

OBJECTIVES:

To compare safety outcomes of generic CsA and TAC with the reference-listed drugs in solid organ transplant patients.

METHODS:

We systematically searched MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception until March 15, 2022, to select randomized and observational studies comparing safety profiles of generic versus brand CsA and TAC in de novo and/or stable solid organ transplant patients. Primary safety outcomes were changes in serum creatinine (Scr) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Secondary outcomes included incidences of infection, hypertension, diabetes, other serious adverse events (AEs), hospitalization, and death. Mean difference (MD) and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS:

Of 2612 publications identified, 32 studies met inclusion criteria. Seventeen studies had a moderate risk of bias. Scr was statistically significantly lower in patients using generic CsA compared to brand at 1 month (MD = -0.07; 95% CI: -0.11, -0.04), while there were no statistically significant differences at 4 months, 6 months, and 12 months. No differences were detected in Scr (MD = -0.04; 95% CI: -0.13, 0.04) and estimated GFR (MD = -2.06; 95% CI: -8.89, 4.77) between patients using generic and brand TAC at 6 months. No statistically significant differences between generic CsA and TAC with their RLDs were observed for secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

Findings support similarity in safety outcomes between generic and brand CsA and TAC in real-world solid organ transplant patients.

OBJECTIVES:

To determine whether spontaneous reporting rates of myocarditis and pericarditis differed in immunocompromised patients compared with the whole population overall, and in terms of demographics, vaccine dose and time-to-onset.

DESIGN:

Systematic review of spontaneously reported data from the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA), the USA and the UK.

DATA SOURCES:

EudraVigilance (EU/EEA), Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS; USA) and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (UK) spontaneous reporting databases were searched from date of vaccine launch to 1 December 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:

Publicly available spontaneous reporting data for 'myocarditis' and 'pericarditis' from EU/EEA and USA following COVID-19 messenger RNA vaccines. Reports with comorbidities or concurrent medication indicative of transplantation, HIV infection or cancer ('immunocompromised' population) were compared with each overall database population.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS:

Two researchers extracted data. Spontaneously reported events of myocarditis and pericarditis were presented for immunocompromised populations for each data source, stratified by age, sex, dose and time-to-onset (where available). Seriousness of each event was determined according to the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Guideline E2A definition. Proportional reporting ratio (PRR) was calculated.

RESULTS:

There were 178 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis among immunocompromised individuals overall. Seriousness was comparable between the immunocompromised and overall populations in both databases. No trends in age or sex were observed among immunocompromised individuals. Most reports followed a second vaccine dose and occurred within 14 days. The frequency of reporting was similar to the wider population (PRR=1.36 (95% CI=0.89 to 1.82) for VAERS population).

CONCLUSIONS:

Myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination are very rare, and benefits of COVID-19 vaccination continue to outweigh any perceived risks. Reporting rates of myocarditis and pericarditis were similar in immunocompromised individuals, however defining characteristics differed compared with the whole population; therefore, continued monitoring of adverse events following vaccination remains vital to understand differences between population subgroups.

INTRODUCTION:

Great advancements in solid organ transplantation (SOT) have allowed patients to have better chances to survive longer and enjoy a quality life after surgery. This increasing number of SOTs and improved long-term survival rates lead to an increasing demand for plastic, esthetic and reconstructive breast procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

A literature search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and using searching terms related to esthetic and reconstructive breast surgery was conducted across three databases: PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar. Included articles were analyzed to extract data points of interest including patient age, type of surgery, organ transplanted, underlying conditions associated with organ transplantation, follow-up, immunosuppressive drugs and their side effects, perioperative management and complications related to the breast plastic procedures in SOT recipients.

RESULTS:

A total of 1,298 articles were retrieved from the mentioned electronic databases. Eight full articles were finally included in this systematic review. In these articles, a total of 41 cases of breast plastic surgery after solid organ transplantation were reported. Procedures were esthetic in nature in 26.83% of cases (11 of 41 cases) and reconstructive in 73.17% of them (30 of 41 cases). No deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although esthetic and reconstructive breast surgery could be performed safely in SOT recipients, the dosage of immunosuppression and patient's overall health status with regard to the length and extent of the planned procedure should always be taken into account. From the literature data analysis, it is not possible to draw a statistical conclusion that the complication rate of surgery in immunosuppressed post-transplant patients is the same as in normal, not immunosuppressed population. Further and more valid clinical studies are warranted.

BACKGROUND:

Vitamin D deficiency is often reported in people with chronic liver diseases. Improving vitamin D status could therefore be beneficial for people with chronic liver diseases.

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of vitamin D supplementation in adults with chronic liver diseases.

SEARCH METHODS:

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov  and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. We scanned bibliographies of relevant publications and enquired experts and pharmaceutical companies as to additional trials. All searches were up to November 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA:

Randomised clinical trials that compared vitamin D at any dose, duration, and route of administration versus placebo or no intervention in adults with chronic liver diseases. Vitamin D could have been administered as supplemental vitamin D (vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol)), or an active form of vitamin D (1α-hydroxyvitamin D (alfacalcidol), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (calcidiol), or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol)).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS:

We included 27 randomised clinical trials with 1979 adult participants. This review update added 12 trials with 945 participants. We assessed all trials as at high risk of bias. All trials had a parallel-group design. Eleven trials were conducted in high-income countries and 16 trials in middle-income countries. Ten trials included participants with chronic hepatitis C, five trials participants with liver cirrhosis, 11 trials participants with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and one trial liver transplant recipients. All of the included trials reported the baseline vitamin D status of participants. Participants in nine trials had baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels at or above vitamin D adequacy (20 ng/mL), whilst participants in the remaining 18 trials were vitamin D insufficient (less than 20 ng/mL). Twenty-four trials administered vitamin D orally, two trials intramuscularly, and one trial intramuscularly and orally. In all 27 trials, the mean duration of vitamin D supplementation was 6 months, and the mean follow-up of participants from randomisation was 7 months. Twenty trials (1592 participants; 44% women; mean age 48 years) tested vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol); three trials (156 participants; 28% women; mean age 54 years) tested vitamin D2; four trials (291 participants; 60% women; mean age 52 years) tested 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D; and one trial (18 participants; 0% women; mean age 52 years) tested 25-hydroxyvitamin D. One trial did not report the form of vitamin D. Twelve trials used a placebo, whilst the other 15 trials used no intervention in the control group. Fourteen trials appeared to be free of vested interest. Eleven trials did not provide any information on clinical trial support or sponsorship. Two trials were funded by industry. We are very uncertain regarding the effect of vitamin D versus placebo or no intervention on all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 1.45; 27 trials; 1979 participants). The mean follow-up was 7 months (range 1 to 18 months). We are very uncertain regarding the effect of vitamin D versus placebo or no intervention on liver-related mortality (RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.08 to 34.66; 1 trial; 18 participants) (follow-up: 12 months); serious adverse events such as hypercalcaemia (RR 5.00, 95% CI 0.25 to 100.8; 1 trial; 76 participants); myocardial infarction (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.08 to 6.81; 2 trials; 86 participants); thyroiditis (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.91; 1 trial; 68 participants); circular haemorrhoidal prolapse (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.14 to 65.9; 1 trial; 20 participants); bronchopneumonia (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.02 to 7.32; 1 trial 20 participants); and non-serious adverse events. The certainty of evidence for all outcomes is very low. We found no data on liver-related morbidity such as gastrointestinal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, ascites, or liver cancer. There were also no data on health-related quality of life. The evidence is also very uncertain regarding the effect of vitamin D versus placebo or no intervention on rapid, early, and sustained virological response in people with chronic hepatitis C.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:

Given the high risk of bias and insufficient power of the included trials and the very low certainty of the available evidence, vitamin D supplementation versus placebo or no intervention may increase or reduce all-cause mortality, liver-related mortality, serious adverse events, or non-serious adverse events in adults with chronic liver diseases. There is a lack of data on liver-related morbidity and health-related quality of life. Further evidence on clinically important outcomes analysed in this review is needed.

The use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has increased secondary to the mounting evidence for comparable efficacy and potentially superior safety to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the general population. However, insufficient data regarding DOAC use in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and numerous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations limit their use in this highly selected patient population. A systematic review of recent clinical evidence on the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to VKAs in SOT recipients was conducted. Additional considerations including transplant-specific strategies for DOAC reversal and common pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic concerns were also reviewed. Although current evidence is limited to single-center retrospective analyses, DOACs, especially apixaban, appear to be a safe and effective alternative to VKAs for SOT recipients with stable graft function and without drug-drug interactions. Reliable data on DOAC reversal at the time of transplant surgery are lacking, and clinicians should consider idarucizumab, andexanet alfa, and other non-specific reversal agents on an individual patient basis. There is no evidence supporting deviations from the Food and Drug Administration labeling recommendations for DOAC dosing in the setting of drug-drug interactions, obesity, and renal function, especially in patients on hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND:

Tacrolimus therapy in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is challenging due to its narrow therapeutic window and pharmacokinetic variability both between patients and within a single patient. Intrapatient variability (IPV) of tacrolimus trough concentrations has become a novel marker of interest for predicting transplant outcomes. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the association of tacrolimus IPV with graft and patient outcomes and identify interventions to improve IPV in SOT recipients.

METHODS:

A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed and Embase from database inception to September 20, 2020. Studies were eligible only if they evaluated an association between tacrolimus IPV and transplant outcomes. Both pediatric and adult studies were included. Measures of variability were limited to standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and time in therapeutic range.

RESULTS:

Forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were published between 2008 and 2020 and were observational in nature. Majority of data were published in adult kidney transplant recipients and identified an association with rejection, de novo donor specific antibody (dnDSA) formation, graft loss, and patient survival. Evaluation of IPV-directed interventions was limited to small preliminary studies.

CONCLUSIONS:

High tacrolimus IPV has been associated with poor outcomes including acute rejection, dnDSA formation, graft loss, and patient mortality in SOT recipients. Future research should prospectively explore IPV-directed interventions to improve transplant outcomes.